Blog Archives

Munkácsy's Christ Trilogy Back in Hungary

1/14/2019

Last week the Hungarian government announced it had successfully acquired Golgotha, the second painting in Mihály Munkácsy's Christ trilogy. The three paintings are now on permanent display in Debrecen, in eastern Hungary. I have never been to Debrecen before; looks like I have a reason to go now.

Details of this story are taken from a short piece that appeared in Hungary Today on January, 2019.

The Hungarian government has purchased 19th-century painter Mihaly Munkacsy’s monumental piece Golgotha, the head of the Prime Minister’s Office said on Wednesday.

The government paid Hungarian-born American art collector Imre Pákh 3 billion forints (EUR 9.3m) for the painting, Gergely Gulyás told a press conference.

The purchase means that all three pieces of Munkácsy’s famous “Christ Trilogy” are now owned by the Hungarian state.

The state had owned Ecce Homo! (1896), the third painting in the trilogy, for years and acquired Christ Before Pilate (1881), another of the three, from Canada’s Art Gallery of Hamilton for 5.7 million US dollars in 2015, with funding from the National Bank of Hungary’s programme to buy national art treasures.

In 2015, talks between the Hungarian government and Pákh on the possible sale of Golgotha to the state fell through and Pákh signalled he was ready to have the painting removed from Debrecen’s Déri Museum.

The government later initiated a procedure to place Golgotha on a list of protected artworks to prevent it from being permanently removed from the country. Pákh in response ordered the painting to be veiled from public view.

In 2016, the Hungarian heritage authority decided to give Golgotha protected status. Pákh appealed the decision, but his claim was rejected. The following year, the Kúria, Hungary’s supreme court, ordered a retrial in the case.

Last year, the government and Pákh entered into negotiations on the painting’s purchase.

Christ Before Pilate - 1881

Ecce Homo - 1896

Golgotha - 1884

0 Comments

Success in Life? Simple. Succeed in Areas in Which Even the Most Successful Fail

1/13/2019

0 Comments

To strive for success is natural and good. Setting aims and then pursuing those aims in the hope of success is not only noble, but a positive affirmation of a prime motivator of human existence. After all, our lives, both at the individual and collective levels, would be considerably impoverished if we failed to or were unable to set goals and then work toward them in the hope of succeeding. Perhaps this addresses a fundamental truth lying at the core of our very existence; that we are essentially goal setters and problem solvers. Though many aspects of our lives provide satisfaction and joy, very few of these rival the deep contentment and elation we feel after we have accomplished a set objective. Conversely, very few aspects of life lead to the discontent and misery we experience when we fail to reach our goals. This success-failure dichotomy fuels our ambitions and forms the overall basic framework that exists at the foundation of almost everything we feel, think, and do.

If this sounds like an overstatement or an oversimplification, then take a moment to imagine two ambitious people – one, an enormous success; the other, a hapless failure. Whom do you inherently admire? Whom do you pity? How do you think each feels about himself or herself? It does not take much imagination to realize the crucial roles success and failure play in our lives. Striving for success is hardwired into the fabric of our being; without the possibility of success, our lives would suffer an immense loss of meaning.

Aspiring toward success is one thing – recognizing success when it happens or exists is another matter entirely. This reveals the enigmatic nature of success and leads us to the awesome task of defining what success truly means. There are times success is obvious, such as the achievement of a minor personal goal, and there are times success is more obscure, such as an apparent failure that opens avenues to greater success in the future. Sometimes success is the result of intention, talent, hard work, and dedication; sometimes it is a purely a result of luck, chance, happenstance, and circumstance. Success can be earned and deserved, or unearned and undeserved. Sometimes people who should succeed, fail; and sometimes people who should fail, succeed. This proves success is not always guaranteed even when the right actions towards its attainment are taken. Bookshelves around the world overflow with tomes and self-help guides offering formulas for success in as many areas in life as there are stars in the night sky, and though these books do occasionally offer useful advice, none can claim to have truly found the elusive “secret of success.” Despite this, we have all experienced and continue to experience various degrees of success in our lives. The trouble is, we often do not recognize our success as such, choosing instead to belittle our achievements by comparing them to the achievements of those we deem truly successful.

Now there is nothing wrong with admiring the achievements of great individuals and being inspired by their accomplishments, but it is foolish to constantly compare yourself to the standards of success Hollywood, Wall Street, the Super Bowl, Washington, and the New York Times bestseller lists project into the world because they are mostly narrow and inflated, focusing almost exclusively on the material trappings of success – power, privilege, material wealth, luxury, glamor, and fame. Yet, for a vast majority of people these are the exact things that epitomize success and the driving motivation behind their desire to attain it. Put another way, I would posit most people are more interested in the “ends” of success than they are in the “means.” Acquiring the trappings of success – a big house, expensive car, flashy clothes, a large bank account, influential connections, fame – are, thus, more important to most than the means through which they managed to obtain such trappings. For this reason, I would argue the outward appearance of success carries far more weight in the modern imagination than any actual success does.

Before I am accused of being some sort of raving communist, let me clearly state that I am not against big houses, expensive cars, fame, and all the rest of it even though these things do not provide much thrust in my own ambitions. What concerns me more are the many successful, but ultimately miserable, people I have met in the course of my life. The successful-but-miserable can be divided into two distinct categories: those who possess all the outward appearances of success, but have failed in many areas of life regardless; and those who possess very few of the outward appearances of success, but have succeeded in many areas of life regardless. In the first category are the business people, politicians, Hollywood A-listers, rock stars, bestselling novelists, and others who have achieved immense fame and fortune and regularly project that onto the world, but have otherwise failed in areas that seem crucial to securing true contentment and happiness. In the second category are those who belong to the non-descript masses who, despite their various degrees of material achievement, have not achieved any notable wealth or fame, but have managed to succeed in areas of life that seem to assure higher levels of contentment and happiness.

Of course, not everyone in the first category fails in the more subtle areas of life. Some people truly do have it all. And not everyone in the second category succeeds in the more subtle areas of life. Some people truly do have very little. The overarching point I am making is this – just because you do not possess the outward appearance of success does not mean you are not successful. By all means, strive for the trappings if you wish, but do not sacrifice success in other vital areas of life as you pursue these rewards, because it is not the material trappings that will fill your life with meaning and contentment, but the other areas, those exact areas in which many “successful” people ultimately fail.

The following is a brief list of some the areas of life in which many so-called successful people fail. These are areas in which you could prove yourself far more successful than most. In my mind, the final point on this list is the most important, supplanting all others, but for what it is worth, I will mention the others nonetheless:

Marriage

Last I heard half of all marriages ended in divorce; the number may even be higher amongst those considered successful. Gossip rags and tabloids abound with tales of infidelity, divorce, and broken marriages among the successful. Despite having it all, many successful people struggle to hold a marriage together, and ultimately fail. Some fail several times. The same holds true for the less successful. Though it is not widely regarded as a mark of success, getting married and staying married could truly be a seen as a high-water mark of achievement in our world of easy and common divorces.

Sincerity

Many a success story is built upon a foundation of lies, pretense, and hypocrisy. If you can maintain your integrity, go into the world with honesty, and deal with people frankly, not only will you sleep better at night, but you will have achieved something many successful seem utterly incapable of achieving.

Debt

We imagine successful people are swimming in money, but in many instances, the opposite is the case. How many times have we heard members of the rich and famous suddenly declaring bankruptcy despite the millions or billions they have earned? Remember, many successful people invest heavily in the appearance of success, and these appearances do not pay for themselves. In their dealings, successful business people often assume large debt loads, together with the accompanying worry and stress. Using debt to build a business is often unavoidable, but as Dickens noted nearly two centuries ago, the dividing line between happiness and misery can come down to simply being six pence below one’s annual income. Debt is a common problem among the less successful as well, so if you can find ways to reduce or free yourself of debt entirely, you will have succeeded materially in a way most people can barely imagine, regardless of their station in life.

Obscurity

Many regard fame as an important sign of success, but rarely consider what being famous truly entails. Imagine being gawked at everywhere you went, having paparazzi hound you day and night, and being a constant focal point of media interest. For some people this amounts to a dream, the fulfillment of Oscar Wilde’s famous quip that the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about, but obscurity is not without its benefits. Being able to travel and go about your daily routine without the fear of being spotted or recognized has its own neglected charms, and the world abounds with successful people who purposefully avoid the limelight for these reasons alone.

Substance Abuse

Success stories are often tainted by tragic tales of overdoses, lifetime addictions, and premature deaths due to drug and alcohol abuse. That so many successful people rely on drugs and drink to make it through the day is revealing on several levels. As outsiders, we envy a rock star’s extravagant lifestyle without giving too much thought as to why he blasts himself into oblivion every chance he gets. Of course, substance abuse is rife among those who regard themselves as failures, as it is among average people irrespective of their success or failure in life. Though many of us think successful people use drugs and drink for purely recreational reasons, the stories we hear of on television or in the papers hint at something else entirely. If material wealth, fame, and the trappings of success were all that were required to achieve happiness, why is intoxication necessary? If you can stay sober in your life, you have succeeded at avoiding a trap that is the death knell of many.

Faith

No matter who we are, or how far we make it, we all face the same ultimate physical end. Regardless of our success in life, we all become equal in death. We enter the world with nothing but our bodies, and leave the world in the same manner, leaving behind all the material wealth we created, the privilege we had inherited or earned, the lands we conquered, and the empires we built. All that remains is our children, the memory of us, and our works. True, the works of greatest talents and world influencers remain with us indefinitely, but even these works can become distorted or fall out of fashion with the passage of time. In the end, our material legacy becomes a zero-sum game – you cannot take it with you and you can no longer control it once you are gone.

This obvious truth notwithstanding, the vast majority of us continue to view success from a purely materialistic perspective, yet there is One who has shown us where true success really resides – not purely in the material, but in the blend of the material and the spiritual. By accepting the gift Jesus offers, ultimate success can be achieved by embracing love, transcending death, and gaining everlasting life.

This, in my mind, marks the apex of the success we can achieve on this Earth. Not only is it the greatest of all rewards, but it is one that is freely available to every single one of us. Like other forms of success, it requires work, dedication, and right action. Unlike other forms of success, it does not project any material appearance of success. Yet it remains highest form of success a person can achieve in this life, and if you accept the gift He offers with all your love and soul, you ultimately cannot and will not fail.

In the end, this is not only the final success we can experience, but also the most important and most meaningful, which makes one wonder why so many, especially among the most successful, simply reject it and refuse to pursue it.

0 Comments

John Dowland - English Renaissance Lute - Music I Have Been Listening To Lately

1/12/2019

0 Comments

I only started listening to John Dowland's music three or four years ago, which makes me pause and wonder why it took so long for me to discover this incredible composer. His lute compositions are particularly enchanting and tinged with just the right amount of meloncholia. Sometimes I let his music play endlessly for hours as I go about my daily routine at the university or when I am at home working at my desk. The internet is full of "music for reading and relaxing" compilations, but if you want some soothing music that helps you focus, none compare to Dowland's lute pieces, as far as I'm concerned.

Many of Dowland's lute compositions have been recorded and are readily available online via You Tube. My favorite recordings feature the brilliant and masterful lutenist Paul O'Dette. If you have never listened to Dowland's music, O'Dette's playing, or lute music in general, I cannot recommend it highly enough.

Some information courtesy of Infogalactic:

John Dowland[1] (1563 – buried 20 February 1626) was an English Renaissance composer, lutenist, and singer. He is best known today for his melancholy songs such as "Come, heavy sleep" (the basis for Benjamin Britten's Nocturnal), "Come again", "Flow my tears", "I saw my Lady weepe" and "In darkness let me dwell", but his instrumental music has undergone a major revival, and with the 20th century's Early music revival has been a continuing source of repertoire for lutenists and classical guitarists.

Paul R. O'Dette (born February 2, 1954, Columbus, Ohio, United States) is an American lutenist, conductor, and musicologist specializing in early music.
O'Dette began playing the electric guitar in a rock band in Columbus, Ohio, where he grew up. Eventually this led him into playing guitar transcriptions of lute music, and not long after that he opted for the lute (as well as the related archlute, theorbo, and Baroque guitar) as his primary instruments, and now he specializes in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music. He has made more than 120 recordings, earning five Grammy nominations and numerous other awards. In addition to his activities as a performer, Paul O'Dette is an avid researcher, having worked extensively on the performance and sources of seventeenth-century Italian and English solo song, continuo practices and lute technique.

And finally, the music . . .

0 Comments

If You Want To Read A Novel About Transition-Era Budapest, I Humbly Offer Mine

1/11/2019

0 Comments

The first English language novel I read that was set in transition-era Budapest was Arthur Phillips' ironically titled narrative Prague, which was, well, not very good. There have been a smattering of other novels focused on transition-era (1989 to roughly 2000) Budapest and Hungary since then. Some are better than others, but very few capture the turbulence and flux of those tempestuous years.

Thirty years have passed since the collapse of communism in Hungary, and its capital city Budapest has transformed into a somewhat trendy tourist hotspot complete with all the positives and negatives that accompany such a development. As interest in the city and country grows, people inevitable seek out stories. With this in mind, I humbly offer you check out my novel The City of Earthly Desire, which documents the darker side of liberalization focusing on subject matter few authors would be willing to explore.

0 Comments

Lego - Still One of the Best Toys on the Market

1/11/2019

0 Comments

Lego was my favorite toy when I was a child. The small, plastic, interconnectable building blocks provided endless hours of creative enjoyment. Though I never thought about this at the time, I imagine spending hours building things from Lego helped nurture my creative, reasoning, planning, and fine motor skills. As far as I remember, no other toy provided as much satisfaction and fun.

Interestingly enough, Lego has become my son's favorite toy as well. I had no influence over this development, other than purchasing him a small Star Wars Lego set when he turned four. Since then, he has become an avid Lego builder, and even suffers withdrawal symptoms if he does play with his Lego sets for a day or more. It's fascinating to watch him sit, sometimes for hours on end, clacking the blocks together as he manifests the visions in his imagination. When I see him playing Lego, I am also reminded of other benefits playing with Lego imparts upon children - patience, independence, problem-solving, and the list goes on.

Even though stepping on a Lego block in the middle of the night remains one of the most painful things a human being can experience on this planet, it's a small price to pay in exchange for this jouet extraordinaire.

0 Comments

Perversion - A Word That Is Becoming Increasingly Difficult To Use

1/10/2019

0 Comments

Language, the English language especially, is in a constant state of flux, endlessly morphing and changing with the passage of time. New words and phrases enter the language while other words and phrases, some centuries-old, become obsolete or are simply expelled from common usage like unwanted exiles. Some words remain in the language, but their meanings and definitions alter so drastically that the original definitions become like neglected tombstones of long-forgotten ancestors buried in some distant land.

The word gay is perfect example of this. Mention gay today and nearly everyone will assume you are referring to homosexuality rather than happiness or joy (though for some individuals, the word could mean both simultaneously, but that's another story). In any case, you will have a difficult time convincing people gay once meant happy. When I was a high school teacher, I often had to explain the original definition of gay to a class after the word appeared in some nineteenth-century novel or other we happened to be reading. More often than not, my students simply could not accept that gay merely meant happy in the past and implied no other connotations within the confines of the text. Thus, whenever the word appeared, they instantly assumed some sudden revelation of an author’s or a character’s sexual orientation; my attempts to counter this usually failed, especially when we read Oscar Wilde, but that’s a different matter entirely.

I am one of these strange people who likes etymology. I think about words and their meanings and the historical development of these meanings quite often, especially when it comes to perfectly straightforward words that seem to be on the cusp of meaning transformation, not simply through their ascription to other things, as in the example above, but rather through the transformation of society (though gay could qualify under this category, too). Put another way, some words are becoming increasingly meaningless or lose their original meaning because changes in society no longer reflect the original definition of the word. The verb “to pervert” might be a perfect exemplar. The word continues to exist, but the boundaries of what it defines have blurred; it is often difficult to know in what situations or circumstances perversion can be appropriately applied today.

Ten minutes of extremely hasty and sloppy internet research into the etymology of pervert/perversion revealed the following. Originally from the Latin, the word is combination of per (meaning thoroughly or to an extreme degree) and vertere (to turn). Thus, the original Latin meaning of the word was an extreme or thorough turn. This matches the Proto-Indo-European wert, which means to turn or rotate. The word eventually found its way into French and then migrated to English, but the essential meaning of pervert - an inherently positive, natural, acceptable, or good thing being turned in the wrong direction, or being turned away from, or leading someone away from something considered good and acceptable - has remained intact regardless of which language it called home. As we shall see, what can be perverted tends to change as the perceived good, natural, and acceptable thing changes through history.

I imagine the Romans considered perverted anyone or anything that took an extreme turn away from the core values of fides, pietas, religio, disciplina, gravitas, dignitas, and virtus, known collectively as the mos mairorum, which roughly translates to “ancestral code.” Unlike the written law, the mos mairorum was more of less an unwritten set of principles dictating virtues, behavior, and social practices. Oddly enough, the Romans had no qualms about orgies, slavery, or gladiatorial games, none of which crossed the threshold of perversion in their minds.

When the word was employed in English in the thirteenth century, it was used almost exclusively to delineate the act of turning away or turning someone away from Christianity, which was considered the highest good, reflecting the religiousness of the age. I imagine as the centuries passed, the definition of perversion expanded beyond the realm of religious belief at the same pace Christianity weakened, though this is merely speculation on my part. Whatever the real reason, perversion was slowly applied to any field in which a turning away from a right course or a proper state was observed. Subsequently, everything possessing a proper or good state could, in essence, be perverted – law, justice, language, and yes, even sex. By the time we get to the Victorian Age, it seems the bulk of what was labelled perversion centered on sex, reflecting the rigid, normophilic mores of the time. By the twentieth century I imagine perversion had all but lost its original religious connotations and was used almost exclusively in reference to sex practices (kink, swingers, homosexuality, etc.) that turned away from mainstream sexual behaviors. Otherwise, perversion simply came to mean something similar to distortion or corruption when used in phrases such a perversion of justice.

In our contemporary world, it is becoming increasingly difficult to use the word perversion, be it in noun, verb, or adjective form. Though phrases like perversion of justice still appear now and then, they are growing scarcer as our definition of justice changes and blurs. The infrequency of the word perversion to describe a turning away from the good, the natural, and the acceptable has much to do with the historical development and current state of Western culture, which has all but abandoned Christianity and its definitions of the good, the natural, and the acceptable in favor of a mos maiorum based on the progressive philosophical and political movements of the past two hundred years alone.

Contemporary Western culture has not merely turned away from its ancestral customs, mores, and religion, but is actively, openly, and vehemently hostile to them all. Unlike Ancient Rome, or Medieval Europe, looking to the past for guidance is considered backward and regressive today. Most intellectuals today view the past as a dungeon; historical customs, behaviors, and religion become chains and barbaric torture devices. Progress dictates individuals and societies liberate themselves and others from the shackles of the past oppression and create new values, new principles, and new virtues. An inversion has taken place (note the root vert in the word inversion). The good that once was is no longer believed to be good, but its opposite; accordingly, taking an extreme turn away from or leading people away from these inherently malevolent and evil structures cannot, therefore, be considered perverted acts. Thus, what a mere century ago was considered perverted by the vast majority of society, is today not only considered acceptable, but is actively encouraged and celebrated, which makes using the word perversion today tricky business indeed.

In the end, I believe perversion, both as a word and as a concept, will not lose its meaning. It will survive, and it will survive with its meaning intact. The only thing that has changed and continues to change, is the definition of what constitutes perversion. We live in an era during which the definition of what constitutes the “good, natural, and acceptable” has shifted radically - so much so, that previous notions of "the good, natural, and acceptable" have nearly been forgotten.

In light of this, one does not need to think too hard about possibilities to understand what will or already defines perversion today. The bigger question is how will those who embody the new mos mairorum, this more modern sense of what is good, natural, and acceptable ultimately deal with those who deviate from these new set boundaries.

At the moment, the outlook for those turning away from these newer standards of what is considered good, natural, and acceptable is rather bleak, to say the least.

0 Comments

Palestrina - Music I Have Been Listening to Lately

1/9/2019

0 Comments

Giovanni Pierluigi da Palestrina (c. 1525 – 2 February 1594) was an Italian Renaissance composer of sacred music and the best-known 16th-century representative of the Roman School of musical composition. He had a lasting influence on the development of church music, and his work is considered as the culmination of Renaissance polyphony. (excerpted from Infogalactic)

Wonderful to listen to full focus, or as background when reading/working.

0 Comments

What Lifelong Learning Really Implies

1/8/2019

0 Comments

On the surface there does not seem to be anything particularly negative or suspicious about the term lifelong learning. It has become quite trendy in education and human resources circles over the past decade or two and tends to surface with increasing regularity at most workplaces. On the surface, the overall implication of lifelong learning seems innocuous enough. The term seems to suggest the days of learning something once and then doing that one thing for the rest of your life are history; hence, one is told, lifelong learning is crucial to ensuring one's viability and success in the global workforce. Seems practical and pragmatic enough, like a reassuring piece of advice that just makes sense.

Nevertheless, those who lobby for lifelong learning usually handle the concept as one of unfathomable profundity that seems to supercede the understanding of most average people who simply assume lifelong learning refers to acquiring new workplace related skills such as mastering a new computer program or obtaining some other concrete form professional development. New skills can be positive since many industries require the consistent updating of acquired skills. Formal training of this kind truly can help one maintain some sense of security or possibility at promotion. To be clear, gaining new hard skills to earn a promotion or embark on a new job is positive and good, which is why most people do not find the idea of lifelong learning objectionable. Nevertheless, they fail to notice that this type of skill or knowledge acquisition is merely the surface that hides the murky depths of what lifelong learning truly is or is in the process of becoming.

A broader overall definition of lifelong learning is required before we proceed further. A quick look on Wikipedia yields the following definition:

Lifelong learning is the "ongoing, voluntary, and self-motivated" pursuit of knowledge for either personal or professional reasons. Therefore, it not only enhances social inclusion, active citizenship, and personal development, but also self-sustainability, as well as competitiveness and employability.

Even after reading something like this, many people will continue to comprehend lifelong learning as a means to validate the necessity of never-ending formal or self-education, especially for working adults who wish maintain some sense of security in a fast-moving, ever-changing, and increasingly complex labor market. Yet is this all that lifelong learning is? Take another look at the definition Wikipedia provides. What is implied by social inclusion, active citizenship, and personal development? How will being an active citizen make you a better sales manager? Truth is, it probably won't, and that's the crux of the matter. In my experience, lifelong learning has proven to be less about the acquisition or improvement of hard skills, and more about the inculcation of cultural and ideological doctrines or, for lack of a better expression essential soft skills.

Hence, the bulk of what can be classified as lifelong learning comprises diversity training, implicit bias training, sexual conduct training, sensitivity training, human rights training, anti-racism training, and a slew of other training programs created to ensure you completely comply with contemporary social, cultural, and corporate values. Put another way, lifelong learning is a way of guaranteeing people "get with the program." Once again, on the surface most people do not find this objectionable. We all want to get along at the workplace, right? Sure, but what if this kind of lifelong learning were presented in a more sincere and transparent way? What if people were told lifelong learning meant they were guilty before being tried, and that the true objective of the training sessions was to force them compromise and reject nearly everything they had once considered true, beautiful, and good?

Of course, the successful acquisition of the soft skills learned at these trainings are now of far greater importance than the acquisition or improvement of any concrete skills could ever be. That is where the "self-sustainability, as well as competitiveness and employability" aspect of the definition above come into play. The equation boils down to something exceptionally simple - if people want to work, they must prove they are completely compliant at all times, which is why they must learn these soft skills for as long as they live. Job security and promotion possibilities will hinge almost exclusively on the successful implementation and acceptance of the concepts learned in these trainings.

If you think I am exaggerating, pause for a moment and consider how many competent, highly-skilled individuals have lost their situations because they outright refused or were merely suspected of refusing to comply to some cultural tenent pegged to the sacred trinity of diversity, inclusivity, and equality. Go to an interview for a job for which you are perfectly qualified and skilled and frankly tell the interviewer you do not agree with the whole implicit bias training thing, or that you do not honestly believe that all people are inherently equal. Then go home and wait for the job offer. I can guarantee you it will never come because you have essentially expressed contempt for lifelong learning, and this has instantly rendered you unemployable.

Now despite what I have written, I am actually a hardcore advocate for lifelong learning. Lifelong learning truly is necessary and crucial, but not the kind described above. No, the lifelong learning I recommend is figuring out means through which you may be able to survive and perhaps even prosper outside the confines of this repressive, totalitarian lifelong learning framework.

If you can figure out a way to do that, you not only win the philosopher's stone, but you may even retain possession of your soul.

0 Comments

Beans - Not For Astronauts; My Son's Favorite Commercial

1/7/2019

0 Comments

A great thing about having a seven-year-old boy around is you get to revisit a state of mind when something as common and vulgar as flatulence epitomized the pinnacle of humor.

Hence, I give you my son's favorite television commercial, which he somehow managed to find on YouTube when his mother was not looking. Behold the hilarity that is Beans - Not For Astronauts!

0 Comments

The Postil Magazine

1/6/2019

2 Comments

Yesterday I discovered The Postil Magazine has published my blog post Budapest - A City of Overtourism in their current issue (you can see the post here).

"Uniting wisdom with the soul" is how The Postil Magazine describes its overall mission. The magazine content is free and contains an array of well-written and thought-provoking articles and other writings focusing on religion, history, philosophy, politics, and art.

The Postil Mazine describes itself in the following manner on its "About Us" page:

OUR LOGO
Our logo – a tree stump, though cut down, yet sprouting – points to a high truth – that good ideas, though cut down, will sprout and grow again. Truth, like energy, cannot be destroyed.

OUR MOTTO
Our Latin motto – Vivida vis animi –means, “the vigorous strength of the mind, or the vigorous strength of the soul,” since the Latin word, animus, can mean both, “mind” and “soul” – which for us means faith and reason and together. It comes from Lucretius’ De rerum natura, Book I, line 72.

OUR VISION
The mission of The Postil Magazine is to recoup a fading vision of humanity, namely, Classical Humanism, rooted in faith and reason, and best expressed in Judeo-Christianity. In other words, we work for the return of Christendom.

This is also the New Humanism, couched in the great tradition of Erasmus of Rotterdam and Sir Thomas More – deep learning, informed by deep faith.

We seek to feed the mind with good ideas, and good ideas are expressions of a celebratory soul. The West needs reseeding with good ideas because it is in the process of losing its soul.

There is a heavy pall of cultural fatigue smothering the West. It is a true Dark Age, where wisdom is confused with information, truth is problematized as spin, faith is ridiculed as superstition, language is tightly controlled, and reason is shouted down by weaponized emotion.

We recognize that human beings cannot live without ideals, without transcendence, without truth. In effect, there can be no humanity without God.

There is a great hunger for deeper faith, for purer enlightenment, for greater virtue, for sharper reason, and for good ideas. In other words, a hunger for truth.

Our task is to rediscover spiritual and intellectual excellence, as expressed in merit. And it is through excellence that humans achieve their greater, eternal purpose – moral beauty. In this way, civilization is the embodiment of both good ideas and virtue.

I warmly thank the editor(s) at The Postil Magazine for including my work in the latest edition of their excellent publication and encourage you to visit and support their site.

I am sure to become a regular reader of the magazine myself.

2 Comments

<<Previous

Forward>>