Francis Berger
  • Blog
  • My Work

A Simpler, Deeper, Fuller Understanding of Christianity is Long Overdue

2/13/2022

5 Comments

 
Theology is the attempt to define how God should be conceptualized and understood. It provides a framework for how we can think about, understand, and relate to God, Creation, ourselves, and other beings. It aims to determine God's character, nature, powers, limitations, and actions. Theology also endeavors to describe God's relationship to humanity, and it develops constructs to explain the boundaries of this relationship.

Above all else, theology strives to do all of this coherently – that is, in a way that makes sense. This means that every axiom, premise, argument, proposition, postulation, etc., within a theological framework must be logical, rational, cogent, methodical, consistent, and well organized, which entails that theology must be systematic. Every “piece” within a theological system must unfailingly cohere with every other “piece” within the system. This coherence is the glue that holds theology together. If any part of a theological system fails to cohere with the whole, the glue weakens and the system becomes shaky.

Thus, most of what passes for theological inquiry and debate amounts to little more than system defense. Those who have assumed the soundness and coherence of a certain system of thought about God and Creation are predominately interested in and dedicated to defending the soundness and coherence of the theological system to which they are committed.

Although they claim to be open to ideas that challenge the soundness and intelligibility of their theological model, they actually are reluctant to engage in these ideas beyond the established definitions of their own framework for the simple reason that such engagement might undermine the coherence of the theological system in which they have invested their belief.
  
Case in point – traditional, classical, orthodox theology teaches that God can create free agents from nothing. It then goes on to construct a coherent system of thought based on that assumption. This is all fine and well, but there is one major problem. The assumption that God can create free agents is just that – an assumption. Nevertheless, it can be assumed to be the case, which has immediate and profound effects on how reality – God, Creation, man, freedom, and all the rest of it -- are perceived and understood.

Yet what if God cannot create free agents from nothing? What then? Well, traditional, classical, orthodox theology simply insists that this would be impossible and illogical. But how exactly is it impossible and illogical? Traditional, classical, theology is more than willing to explain why, but only within the coherence of its own theological framework. It will not address the premise beyond that because to do so would be to challenge the intelligibility and logic of the system of thought.

This approach is easy to see in action. Ask Christians who are committed to classical, orthodox theology about the possibility that God might not be able to create free agents from nothing, and you are bound to get an answer that such a thing is impossible because if it were it would mean the end of God and Creation. Everything would collapse into chaos. Christianity itself would be rendered meaningless. Either that or you will be informed that such thinking is not Christianity but some heresy or error; heresy and error that would destroy the entire story of the New Testament.

The same sort of reaction appears with the idea of uncreated freedom. Grant classical theology its creatio ex nihilio but suggest that freedom precedes being, that it is primordial, that is something that does not come from God, something that God cannot control, and you will be told that such a thing is not rational hence impossible without ever being informed why freedom must be understood as rational. The claim that Christianity would become meaningless and impossible once again resurfaces and we are back to the only “acceptable” view of objective reality enshrined in traditional, classical, and orthodox theology.

Despite the vehement rejections and callous dismissals on the part of those who adhere to traditional theology, coherent ways of thinking about and understanding God, Creation, others, and ourselves can and do arise from the two “alternative” assumptions I have included above.

Yet traditional, mainstream theology refuses to engage seriously with either because they view both as anti-Christian. This refusal to engage does not stem from the desire to defend objective truth. Nor does it come from any love of objective truth.

On the contrary, it originates from fear. Not from the fear that classical, traditional, orthodox theology may be all wrong, but from the fear that mainstream theology may not be all “right”. Thus, the insistence that classical theology is “all right” has more to do with maintaining the coherence of a theological model than it does with any honest and earnest reconsideration of metaphysical reality.

Those committed to classical theology view theological challenges as assaults against the very essence of Christianity when in reality all that is being challenged are "pieces" of their theological framework.

Yet, these challenges are not meant to be destructive. They are not meant to destroy classical theology, but transform it and, dare I say it, redeem it.

The end goal is a simpler, deeper, fuller understanding of Christianity, which classical theology preemptively writes off as impossible.

Yet the fact remains, a simpler, deeper, and fuller understanding of Christianity – and of the big “problems” of freedom, agency, and evil -- is beyond necessary, it is sorely overdue.

If a simpler, deeper, and fuller understanding of Christianity is not considered or “permitted”, Christianity will indeed be rendered meaningless.

In many ways it already has been rendered meaningless. All you have to do is take a look around. 
5 Comments
Jorgen
2/13/2022 20:45:08

The true classical theology is Platonism and it recognizes the idea of free beings being created not from nothing but as emanations from God. The "Omni God" problem was created by the Jews and comes from their inferiority complex. Since they knew they are inferior to all other non-African races, they invented an Omni God concept and claimed this Omni God chose them. Good luck getting it out of Christianity though, because it will be just as hard as getting Evangelicals to stop supporting Israel over and to the detriment of their own nation!

Reply
Francis Berger
2/14/2022 10:11:27

@ Jorgen - As far as I have been able to make out, the god of the Old Testament is not an omnigod, so I'm assuming you are referring to something else in connection with the Jews.

As for the rest of it, I'm not particularly interested in the perceived inferiority complexes of certain groups of people. Nor am I interested in evangelicals who support some nation due to biblical connections.

What I am interested in is Christianity and that begins with Christ.

Reply
Carol
2/13/2022 22:05:52

Well, first, I should say that I'm not at all "orthodox" in my Christianity -
- I don't have any problem at all positing or pondering new, unique ideas in regards to my "theological framework".

To me, viable theories on the nature of God/Creation come down to 'what makes the most sense?'...
...For example, I don't think that God creates "free agents from nothing", I think He created them from Himself - just as Christ was originally a part of God (The Word, who 'was' and 'was with' God in the beginning).

And I can't quite make sense of the concept of the possibility that "freedom precedes being", because it seems to me that 'freedom' is something which beings are 'invested' with -
- I mean, if there is no 'being' to be free or unfree, how can 'freedom' precede being?
It seems likeliest to me that freedom does "come from God", 'and' it is "something that God cannot control" once He has granted it...

This seems to me a much "simpler, deeper, fuller understanding" than the idea of 'primordial' freedom and unlimited numbers of "free agents" existing 'alongside' of God from eternity before 'Creation'.

Reply
Francis Berger
2/14/2022 11:10:11

@ Carol - My simple understanding of Christianity can be summed up in an excerpt from Dostoevsky's The Brother's Karamazov, to which I added a few choice items:

"Thou didst desire man's free love, that he should follow Thee freely into heaven, enticed and taken captive by Thee. In place of the rigid ancient law, man must hereafter with free heart decide for himself what is good and what is evil, and with free heart actively choose resurrection and everlasting life, having only Thy image before him as his guide."

That's it. That's my first thing first. Everything else -- including theology, denomination, doctrines, etc. -- is of lesser importance and comes after.

As for the rest of the post, I wrote this mainly as a response to the traditional Christian penchant for rejecting other Christian theological frameworks and metaphysical assumptions as incoherent and/or as outright repudiations of Christianity.

I don't subscribe to this view. And I don't subscribe to the idea that traditional theology is the only coherent -- hence only correct and valid -- Christian theology.

The two ideas about uncreated freedom are not mine. I merely use them as examples of ideas that challenge traditional theology and provide viable solutions to some of the "problems" inherent in traditional theology, most notably agency, free will, and evil.

They may not make sense to some Christians, but they can and do make sense. Coherent Christian theologies can be constructed from both ideas, but some traditional Christians will not entertain let alone accept such ideas because the ideas do not cohere with THEIR system of coherence. Hence, they label them as incoherent and as repudiations of Christianity.

It's the repudiation of Christianity that bothers me. There are many ways of being a Christian as long as first things -- a free and personal choice to follow Christ -- come first.

Reply
Lady Mermaid
2/15/2022 03:11:15

I definitely agree that Christ needs to be the center and priority, not theological debates. If the Church had understood this over the centuries, it would have had a much greater spiritual impact on the world.

As far as agency and freedom go, perhaps they are part of the creation process itself. It may the case that agency is developed by created beings through interacting w/ God. I believe that God creates from His word or imagination to simplify it. However, as creative agents ourselves, we interact w/ God and provide "feedback" in a sense influencing God.

I have read many successful authors state that their characters develop their own agencies even though they started as products of imagination. Paradoxically, while someone can write any story one wants, one cannot simply write the story in any way one pleases. Maintaining integrity and coherence is much harder than it sounds. The deeper one goes into a creative work, the more that work interacts w/ the creator developing a synergy btw the artist and subject.

To make this more concrete, have you experienced this when you wrote your novel? Did you find your characters to develop their agencies and surprise you even though you technically have full control over your work? Just food for thought.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Blog and Comments

    Blog posts tend to be spontaneous, unpolished, first draft entries ranging from the insightful and periodically profound to the poorly-argued and occasionally disparaging.
     

    Comments are moderated. Anonymous comments are never published (please use your name or a pseudonym). 

    Emails welcome:

    f er en c ber g er (at) h otm   ail (dot) co m
    Blogs/Sites I Read
    Bruce Charlton's Notions
    Meeting the Masters
    From The Narrow Desert
    Synlogos ✞ Aggregator
    New World Island  
    New World Island YouTube
    ​Steeple Tea
    Berdyaev.com
    Adam Piggott
    Fourth Gospel Blog
    The Orthosphere
    Junior Ganymede

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Picture
    A free PDF is also available in My Work. 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.