Francis Berger
  • Blog
  • My Work

Berdyaev's Answer to Monism or Dualism? How About Both?

5/29/2019

4 Comments

 
Monism or dualism? It’s an old argument. Do mind/soul and matter co-exist as one single entity or can mind/soul be separated from matter and exist separately? When I was younger, I bounced back and forth between these two possibilities, yet I could never comfortable remain on one side for too long without feeling the tug of the other side pulling me back. My essential problem was this – despite being essentially diametrically opposed, both monism and dualism made sense to me and both seemed necessary. I felt comfortable in both, and I often found myself questioning why both could not exist simultaneously.

I experienced the same dilemma when confronted with the nature of the world. Is the world essentially evil, fallen, and sinful? Or is it essentially good, redeemed, and sinless? The same holds true for immanence and transcendence. Is God inside or outside the world? As I pondered these questions, I once again found myself favoring the existence of both, but favoring both seems paradoxical and contradictory – a massive example of having your cake and eating it, too. Nevertheless, I have always felt intuitively comfortable within this inherent paradox, so much so that I very much doubt I could survive without it.

Nikolai Berdyaev also found comfort in the paradox I described above. In his book The Meaning of the Creative Act he explicitly states that the two contradictory sides are necessary for it is within them and the paradox they create that the final mystery of Christianity is to be found. The following selection of excerpts from The Meaning of the Creative Act present Berdyaev's views this seeming paradox. (Bold added by me.) 
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
​
I know that I may be accused of a basic contradiction which tears apart all my sense of the world, all my world outlook. I shall be accused of the contradiction of combining an extreme religious dualism with an extreme religious monism. I accept such attacks in advance. I confess an almost Manichean dualism. So be it. The world is evil, it is without God and not created by Him. We must go out of the world, overcome it completely: the world must be consumed, it is of the nature of Ahriman. Freedom from the world is the pathos of this book. There is an objective source of evil, against which we must wage heroic war. The necessity of the given world and the given world are of Ahriman.

Over and against this stands freedom in the spirit, life in divine love, life in the Pleroma. And I also confess an almost pantheistic monism. The world is divine in its very nature. Man is, by his nature, divine. The world process is self-revelation of Divinity, it is taking place within Divinity. God is immanent in the world and in Man. The world and Man are immanent in God. There is no dualism of divine and extra-divine nature, of God’s absolute transcendence of the world and man.

I am entirely conscious of this antinomy of dualism and monism, and I accept it as insurmountable in consciousness and inevitable in religious life. Religious consciousness is essentially antinomic. In our consciousness, there is no escape from the eternal antinomy of transcendent and immanent, of monism and dualism. This antinomy cannot be abolished, neither in conscience nor in reason, but in religious life, in the depth of the religious experience itself. Religious consciousness experiences the world to the fullest extent, both as completely apart from God and as fully divine, experience evil both as falling away from divine reason, and as having an immanent meaning in the process of the world’s development.

A transcendent attitude towards God and towards evil are inevitable in religious experience. But equally inevitable in religious life is the attainment of the immanent truth and the immanent experience of God and the world. And in the final depths, every mystic experience passes beyond all the opposition between the transcendent and the immanent.

This kind of radical, revolutionary, implacable dualism leads to the final monism of divine life, to the divinity of man. This is the whole mystery of Christianity. Through the heroic dualism, through the contrast of the divine and “the world” man enters into the monism of Divine Life. Everything in the world must be lifted on the Cross. Thus, the divine development is realized, the divine creativity. Everything external becomes something inward. And the whole world is my way.

This antinomy is given in religious experience. Only childishly-immature, simple, frightened consciousness is afraid of this antinomy: it is always dreaming of some idealization and justification of evil in the immanent-monistic thesis of antinomy. 

The final human mystery is the birth of God in man. The last mystery of God is the birth of man in God. And this mystery is the one and only mystery: for not only has man need of God, but God has need of man. In this lies the mystery of Christ, the mystery of the God-man. 
4 Comments
bruce charlton
5/30/2019 11:30:42

As a general comment - When we address one of these 'eternal' questions, it may be that we are dealing with a 'polarity' in which the two aspects may be distinguished, but not separated.

Perhaps - The Monists say that the fact they cannot be separated means they are one; the Dualists say that the fact they can be distinguished means there are two...

The reality (of such a reality is acknowledged) may be that there is a single 'dynamic process' that leads to the polarities - being dynamic it happens through-time, therefore cannot be stopped and dissected.

I was convinced of this by Owen Barfield's book What Coleridge Thought which is a *very* difficult read (perhaps because abstract and based on physics metaphors, also because it is presented with full scholarly apparatus). My work on Being and Relationships (in time) aims at re-expressing this without abstraction.

Reply
Francis Berger
5/30/2019 12:03:53

@ Bruce - "When we address one of these 'eternal' questions, it may be that we are dealing with a 'polarity' in which the two aspects may be distinguished, but not separated."

Yes, yes, that's it precisely. It took me quite a while to wrap my head around this.

I like the "dynamic process" idea - it seems to mirror much of Berdyaev describes in his work - and I have enjoyed your posts addressing Being and Relationships.

Reply
William Wildblood link
5/31/2019 19:30:02

That's an excellent passage which gets to the heart of the problem if problem it be. For the reality is neither monism nor dualism can be denied unless they are interpreted exclusively. It's only the human mind or thought which finds this difficult. If you approach the matter intuitively there's no contradiction.

But we are intellectual beasts and so we tie ourselves up in knots because we are unable to reconcile two apparent contradictory things. It's rather like oneness and hierarchical differences which also both exist. I think the problem can be resolved by seeing God not just as spirit (monism) but spirit expressing itself through matter (dualism).

Reply
Francis Berger
5/31/2019 21:04:49

@William - Well said. There is much to be said for the intuitive approach you mention. In this regard, reading Berdyaev is helping me to reconcile the apparent contradictory conception of monism and dualism. These posts (and comments like yours) help me to develop a deeper understanding. Thanks.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Blog and Comments

    Blog posts tend to be spontaneous, unpolished, first draft entries ranging from the insightful and periodically profound to the poorly-argued and occasionally disparaging.
     

    Comments are moderated. Anonymous comments are never published (please use your name or a pseudonym). 

    Emails welcome:

    f er en c ber g er (at) h otm   ail (dot) co m
    Blogs/Sites I Read
    Bruce Charlton's Notions
    Meeting the Masters
    From The Narrow Desert
    Synlogos ✞ Aggregator
    New World Island  
    New World Island YouTube
    ​Steeple Tea
    Berdyaev.com
    Adam Piggott
    Fourth Gospel Blog
    The Orthosphere
    Junior Ganymede

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Picture
    A free PDF is also available in My Work. 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.