Francis Berger
  • Blog
  • My Work

From 'Humans as Things' to 'Humans as Beings': Shifting Our Thinking About Others and Ourselves

12/30/2021

7 Comments

 
The much needed and long overdue shift in human consciousness is a major theme of this blog. Writing about human consciousness is a delicate issue, particularly within a Christian framework, because many Christians are prone to dismiss the subject as pseudo-spiritual psychology, new age quackery, or artless heresy.

​Though I appreciate the discomfort and derision, I have steadfastly maintained that pushing through this discomfort and derision has become necessary and unavoidable – necessary and unavoidable because working on consciousness has become a necessary and unavoidable task for all Christians, regardless of denomination.

Establishing a firm grasp of what human consciousness is and what it does has been a major obstacle for Christians. For the sake of simplicity, I personally define what human consciousness is in the following way: The manner in which we perceive, understand, and think about God, the world, others, and ourselves. As for what human consciousness does (or is capable of doing): The ability to direct, aim or align perception, understanding, and thinking with God and Creation, which encompasses Reality as well as Truth, Beauty, Goodness, Virtue, and so forth.

Consciousness is crucial because it the means through which we establish our fundamental metaphysical assumptions, more specifically, our core beliefs about life, the universe, and everything. Throughout the bulk of history, human consciousness has been an inherently spiritualized consciousness, which means that the core beliefs most people have held about life, the universe, and everything have been based on the understanding and acceptance of the divine and the supernatural.
 
Of course, modern secular-material-atheists use this undeniable fact as a touchstone to tout the superiority of their own contemporary de-spiritualized consciousness. De-spiritualized modern secular-material-atheists view their ‘spiritualized’ ancestors in much the same way adults view children who believe in the existence of Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy. Modern secular-material-atheists may accept the quaintness and charm of such beliefs, but they ultimately reject them as mere fantasies that distort and interfere with their own cold, hard perception of ‘real’ reality.

Since the modern-material-atheist form of despiritualized consciousness repudiates the existence of the divine and the supernatural, it also denies the existence of such attributes within human beings as well as all notions of humans being created in the imago Dei. At best, contemporary despiritualized consciousness perceives and understands human beings as superior things existing within a realm of things.

Consequently, despiritualized consciousness limits its perception, understanding, and thought about human beings to matters of ethics, morality, and utility. Within this framework, the highest calling of a human being is cultivate his or her talents to be well mannered, well behaved, and useful. Since there is no afterlife, human beings must strive to be well behaved, well mannered, and useful in this world, which, essentially, boils down to human society and/or the planet.

Within this conceptualization, relationships between human beings are largely defined by material utility, which encompasses material and social gain as well pleasure seeking and pain avoidance. A good relationship is one that helps the people involved get ahead or feel good, with ‘love’ being ascribed to those people that are best able to supply the most help an individual needs to get ahead or feel good. Bad relationships are those that hinder ‘getting ahead’ or that diminish ‘feeling good’.

From the perspective of despiritualized consciousness, human beings are not really beings, but things. The purpose of interacting with other human things is foster the end goal of being the best, most useful, and happiest human thing an individual can hope to be in this world of otherwise random, purposeless, and meaningless things. Yet the importance of relationships between human things remains a central feature of despiritualized consciousness, which still intuitively understands that the material health and survival of all human things depends almost exclusively on the relationships human things are able to establish between each other for the purposes of utility and hedonism.

In light of this, the attack on human relationships over the past two years is particularly intriguing. In early 2020, human things were reclassified as potential biological hazards to other human things. This reclassification flipped the entire secular-material-atheist human thing value system on its head. Suddenly, the health and survival of all human things depended almost exclusively on limiting or destroying the relationships human things are able to establish with each other. The most useful thing a well-mannered and well-behaved human thing to do for other human things and the world was to regard other human things as potential hazards. Getting ahead and feeling good suddenly meant limited contact and self-isolation, even from those one professed to ‘love’ – nay, more so for those one professed to ‘love’.

The past two years have provided us a masterclass on the fatal perceptions that govern despiritualized consciousness, most notably, in how it views humans and human relationships. If humanity continues obstinately adhere to this limited consciousness, it surely lead to death – spiritual and physical.

The much need and long overdue shift in human consciousness is vital not only to the development of human beings on the spiritual plane, but also to the very survival of human beings on the material plane.

In a post from mid-December, Dr. Charlton argued for the establishment of a cosmic perspective as an antidote to the dead end perspective of ethics:

Our fundamental way of thinking ought to be a matter of imagining and picturing our-selves in a cosmic perspective - where we came from, where we are going; what are the real and eternal things and how do we personally relate to them.

Cosmic perspective is a good way to conceptualize the much needed and long overdue shift in human consciousness. For too long, Christians have limited their fundamental way of thinking, especially in matters concerning how we relate to others and see ourselves. The way Christians imagine and picture themselves, others, and human relationships is practically inseparable from the way in which despiritualized secular-material-atheists imagine and picture themselves, others, and human relationships.
 
For proof of this, we need look no further than the way in which many Christians and nearly all Christians churches responded to the birdemic crisis in 2020 – and continue to do so even today! What do these responses say about how Christians and Christian churches understand human beings? How about real or eternal things? What do these responses reveal about how Christians and Christian churches relate to human beings? To real and eternal things?

Christians simply must – and I do mean must – shift their perceptions, understanding, and thought, and they can begin by expanding the way in which they perceive, understand, and think about themselves and others.

This is something I have been actively pursuing for well over two years now. Instead of perceiving, understanding, and thinking about myself and others as merely human beings or, worse, human things, I have started to think about and understand others and myself as eternal beings first and temporary humans second. This does not entail any disparagement of the human form – because I believe we maintain our human forms when we are resurrected into everlasting life – but it does entail a forthright rejection of our temporary human forms in this mortal world as the be all and end all of our existence.

This ‘shift’ in thinking means I try to view people as beings who possess an inherent divine spark through which they are capable of achieving divinity in life everlasting. This ‘cosmic perspective’ often bleeds into how I relate to others and how I perceive others relating to me, which has led to a deepening appreciation of the relationships I have, have had, and hope to have. These relationships include living people, but also the dead, including my interactions with various remnants and works the dead have left behind in this mortal world.
 
Shifting the focus onto ‘being’ has also added depth to the concept of spiritual learning. No relationship, encounter, or experience is random or meaningless. I resist the modern urge to view people as means to social, material, or hedonistic ends, and focus instead on them as beings with whom I can interact to deepen spiritual learning. I spend a great deal of time meditating about human beings I would like to meet – not specific people, but rather kinds of people. I have become aware of many relationships of mine that seem to have reached a being-to-being level communication. This is rarely, if ever, stated explicitly, but the implicit understanding within the relationship is impossible to deny.

At the same time, shifting the focus onto ‘being’ has also added depth to the great tragedy of modern despiritualized consciousness. Every day I have experiences and encounters with human beings who deny the reality of others and themselves as beings – beings who simply refuse to budge from their obstinate stance. I also have experiences and relationships with beings who understand themselves as beings, but have actively chosen the side of evil rather than good. These experiences and relationships are few in number for me personally, but they are by far the most instructive as well as the most demanding.

Interestingly enough, my work on perceiving and understanding humans as ‘beings’ rather than mere humans or human things has gradually spilled over into other parts of Creation. Into a world filled with alive and thinking beings, and a world of unseen but equally present alive and thinking beings.

I know some Christians will continue to dismiss what I have noted above as pseudo-spiritual psychology, new age quackery, or artless heresy, but before they do, I humbly ask them to consider something Dr. Charlton noted in the same blog post I referred to earlier:

The cosmic perspective is also the level at which Jesus Christ's teaching is primarily directed. He was not primarily an ethical teacher, nor was his work an ethical work . . . Until we can - this time consciously and by choice - recover that 'cosmic' attitude; it seems that Christ's message and offer will continue to fall on deaf ears; or merely be translated into the feeble and cowardly 'pseudo-faith' we see dominant among the leadership of all the major 'Christian' churches.
7 Comments
Amo
12/30/2021 23:02:11

Thank you for this. Absolutely!

Reply
Dirt Farmer
12/31/2021 15:00:28

What you're suggesting certainly isn't spiritual quackery or psychology ... this most-excellent essay delves deeply into the ramifications of genuine sanctification. The primary focus of sanctification is ridding ourselves of the "old man" and putting on the "new man." As young Christians we may focus on the externals - and there are certainly many external sins to address. But the heart is what God is always after, and to my mind one's heart is equivalent to one's worldview - the lens through which we perceive reality.

The fact that so many in the Church cannot perceive the reality of the last 2 years is an indictment of modernity's view of sanctification.

Reply
Francis Berger
12/31/2021 16:50:04

@ Dirt Farmer - Yes, I agree. Recognizing the "old man" and putting on the "new man" is key, even if we fail to completely don that "new man." The recognition points you in the right direction and opens up opportunities for God, which alone is a massive step in the right direction.

Reply
bruce charlton
12/31/2021 15:57:11

A lot of meat here for one post!

We both agree on this, so I will add something from my experience of trying to adopt the kind of perspective you advocate. For me, it is a lesson which needs to be learned again every day - indeed more than once a day.

I can have an insight concerning how I want to see the world, but against the pressures of this world and against my own ingrained (often unconscious) habits, I lapse again and again.

But I don't think this represents 'failure' because this mortal life is not designed so that we can just transform ourselves by wanting (which is just as well, considering some of the evil ways I have wanted to transform myself at some times).

If mortal life is about learning, then there are some things we need to experience many times in order to learn deeply, or maybe I need to learn many different specific aspects of the same general lesson.

And that learning may not be apparent until after resurrection - after all, this mortal life always ends in death and forgetting of everything; so learning for this life would, in the end, always be futile.

I suppose this is where egotism and defensive traits can be harmful - it is tempting to pretend we have been transformed for the better - when the truth is that we have only *realized* that such transformation is needed, and that we want it.

Luckily that is all that is required of us!

Jesus Christ came to save sinners, after all - but repentant sinners. Recognition and choice of The Good is 'all' which is required - but even that is difficult enough for a lifetime of learning.

So, to recognize and want the 'cosmic' perspective will no doubt suffice; even if we lapse from it again and again, and even when no 'progress' is made towards it.

Reply
Francis Berger
12/31/2021 16:53:55

@ Bruce - Well put. I completely agree. Spiritual learning is not about flipping a switch to instant transformation, but about the desire and motivation to transform.

Reply
Todd
1/2/2022 07:18:42

Thanks for this essay.
Could one think of an important aspect of this as seeking relationships with other beings as ends in themselves? That is, there is a value to the relationship itself, so the relationship doesn't have to help us gain some other end in a utilitarian manner.
The modern world is absurdly utilitarian, but few seem to ask the question: what is the destination of all this "utility"? Do we really want to go there?
Simple example: let's say that endless social distancing could lengthen our lifespans magically by 50%, or 100%. Would that be a worthwhile goal? What would be the point?
How can people not see that transforming society such that life is no longer worth living in order to lengthen life is beyond absurd, but outright evil?
What a time to witness. It's pure madness that can only be understood if one sees that good and evil exist, and that beings exist, and that God exists, and opposition to God.

Reply
Francis Berger
1/2/2022 21:58:53

@ Todd - Yes, good points. Christianity is an intensely personal religion, one based on personal relationships. Even our relationship with God is personal. For Christians, the best relationships are those that have an implicit spiritual dimension. For example, when a Christian loves someone, he primarily loves the spiritual element of the beloved. This love of the spiritual element should supersede all other factors - utility, physical, pleasure, etc. Thus, I would hope that Christian relationships focus on primacy of the spiritual over all other factors - at least to the greatest extent that it is possible.

Another way to look it could be this - does God love us for our utility or is something more involved?

If there is any utility in the spiritual element then I sense it would be centered on spiritual learning.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Blog and Comments

    Blog posts tend to be spontaneous, unpolished, first draft entries ranging from the insightful and periodically profound to the poorly-argued and occasionally disparaging.
     

    Comments are moderated. Anonymous comments are never published (please use your name or a pseudonym). 

    Emails welcome:

    f er en c ber g er (at) h otm   ail (dot) co m
    Blogs/Sites I Read
    Bruce Charlton's Notions
    Meeting the Masters
    From The Narrow Desert
    Synlogos ✞ Aggregator
    New World Island  
    New World Island YouTube
    ​Steeple Tea
    Berdyaev.com
    Adam Piggott
    Fourth Gospel Blog
    The Orthosphere
    Junior Ganymede

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Picture
    A free PDF is also available in My Work. 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.