If Even a Fraction of the What the Anti-Peck Blogs Are Reporting Is True . . .

10/23/2022

Back at the beginning of the summer, I responded to the apparent "death of the birdemic" with the phrase "long live the birdemic".

Though I did not know what details would unfold, I had a strong sense that the powers-that-should-not-be would be quite reluctant to completely release their grip on the birdemic -- or, more precisely, to release the grip the birdemic has on the world.

Well, it is now mid-autumn. Thankfully, the masks, social distancing, and other birdemic restrictions have remained largely on the sidelines.

On the other hand, peck mandates continue to persist -- the most recent and by far most egregious example being the CDC's 15-0 vote in favor of including the birdemic peck in regimens for preschool children.

Though it is difficult to shock me these days, I must admit that even I was bewildered by that particular piece of System communication. Then again, System communication is about manipulation and coercion, not information, so there's no knowing what the communication actually means or what -- if anything -- it might actually lead to.

Speaking of information, I spend an hour or so a week browsing the various articles and posts created by what I would describe as the anti-peck blog subgenre.

Though I am and have always been squarely against the peck and all of its associated evil manipulations, lies, and coercion, I often don't know what to make of the information I encounter on these anti-peck blogs. Some of it seems sensationalistic; some of it seems skewed; and some it seems downright speculative.

All the same, much of it rings true, and some of it seems utterly undeniable, which inevitably leads to me to the following thought:

If even a fraction of what the anti-peck blogs are reporting is true, then the birdemic is very much alive. Moreover, it has entered or may soon enter an even darker phase.

Note added: By sensationalistic, skewed, and speculative, I am referring to specific side effect claims like the peck will hook everyone up to some kind of central 5G network or that it has *already* killed billions or specific predictions like every pecked person dying by Christmas and so forth.

I have no doubt that the peck is evil, harmful, and potentially deadly. I am sure that it has already caused many side effects and deaths and is likely to cause many more. Moreover, I am also certain the System is doing everything in its power to hide and obscure data about the peck's harms. At the same time, some of the side effect claims and numbers I have encountered on anti-peck blogs strike me as dubious.

6 Comments

Heather Shaler

10/24/2022 02:15:43

I was surprised with the CDC vote, too. I thought the system would take the opportunity to appear wise, benevolent, restrained, and willing to change course based on whatever The Science is saying nowadays.

It affects far more than just public schools. The Catholic school my kids attended pre-birdemic required it (incidentally, it was a pretty trad parish with a Latin Mass and everything. They bought the birdemic hook, line, and sinker. I'm not a trad anymore). Most local pediatricians will drop patients who are more than 6 months behind schedule. This is huge.

I feel like we're being violently shaken out of a deep sleep. How many people will keep blandly going along with this?

Francis Berger

10/24/2022 08:14:22

@ Heather - Some of the Catholics with whom I have interacted are on the right side when it comes to the peck and the birdemic, but the responses from the majority I have encountered has been a combination of shoulder-shrugging, rationalization, and willful negligence. This includes a great many who pride themselves on being trads and who vehemently defend the infallibility of tradition. I honestly don't know what to make of this, and I've given up discussing the issue with such Catholics. They're hopeless.

The power that shouldn't be are definitely playing the long game here, and they do not seem to care about the destruction they are unleashing. The fact that they would now focus intensely on children reveals the despicable levels of indifference and evil.

Coincidentally, several major universities, including Harvard and Columbia, have recently updated their mandates and require the new booster peck. Once again, I see nothing but destruction here. Places like Harvard and Columbia are nurseries for the next generation of SJWs, system appatchicks, etc., yet the System is is not shielding them from harm. Quite the contrary (assuming the pecks they administer in these places are as harmful as others that have been administered in other places).

As to your question, I'm afraid I don't know. Maybe this latest assault against the children will be the straw, at least one would hope.

Jeffrey Cantrell

10/24/2022 17:30:33

As Sherlock Holmes said, "[W]hen you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?" Without applying a "socially acceptable" filter to what is being said and just looking at what is actually being said, there can be no doubt that the system is trying to kill western civilization and everyone in it, including me personally. That is what I see and hear. Think of Øbama when he said that he was going to fundamentally change America. Most people heard that and substituted what they wanted for that change and voted for him. There is no doubt that Øbama did fundamentally change America, but not in the way most people thought.

Once you accept the concept of Sorathic evil, you no longer need to look for a "reason" for this attack on "civilization," nor do you need to waste energy trying to "understand" what is happening. The truth stands out clearly, you only need to "see" it.

10/24/2022 19:28:23

@ Jeffrey - Death and destruction are not the worst thing Sorathic evil can inflict. Corruption and damnation are.

Most of the anti-peck blogs do good work, but I suspect some are run by converged elements looking to ramp up the corruption and damnation on the back of death of destruction.

Ingemar

10/25/2022 18:47:41

I had a brilliant comment written here, but I forgot to press "Submit." Oh well, here goes again--

I came to reject the anti-peck hysteria on the same intuitive basis that I did the pro-lockdown hysteria; it was driven by a spirit of fear. The anti-peckers promised us that millions would die within six months; when that failed to happen, they expanded that timeline to two years, then to five.

I had an uncle receive two doses of the peck, catch CORVID anyway, and die. I had a cousin get pecked while pregnant--she and baby are fine.

Does this validate the pro-peck side? Certainly not. Their frauds will not soon be forgotten. But they will be protected from the consequences of their actions until the very institutions supporting them rot at the foundations.

lea

10/27/2022 04:43:12

Many of these claims, even if they eventually turn out true, have showed parts of the altmedia succumb to the trend of drawing attention with sensational headlines and wild speculation. Bad news sells, someone on the financial side of things i watch now and then even went into his personal tube metrics and how they declined when he started using more calm and evenhanded 'headlines', and therefore stopped doing so. News is as news does or something like that.

I am increasingly leaning towards the Steinerian take on all of this though, even when it intuitively makes no sense for -such a thing to be possible- (?). Perhaps he was offering a metaphor for the dire spiritual consequences of consenting with something this 'obviously' malicious.

That touches on musings i've had about a kind of fork in the road between a natural and technological path into the future that seems to unfold itself lately, which relates to the very niche thing of philosophical steampunk, Frank Herbert (who appeared oddly in favour of eugenics in his work at the same time) and Jacques Ellul's laborious and vague concept of 'technique' - which i intuitively agree with despite abhorring the apparent writing style of sociology. It also has a scent of Paul Levy's 'Wetiko'.

At differing points they all seem to ask the question; to what extent can technology and civilization co-exist somewhat harmoniously, before almost inevitably a kind of self-referential drive towards endless 'improvement' takes over all the narratives?

Considering level four gain of function labs; because you can does not equate that you should, but lots of people are simply no longer interested in the risks, only fascinated or even obsessed with the potential. And that would be the point where (some of) my earlier references argue that technology itself can become a mindset rather then a tool, perhaps even a spiritual infection drawing people into a mechanical cosmology where everything around them turns into a resource to 'build something better' with, rather than a part of creation.

It's a general notion of 'nature is faulty, we shall improve it'. Which then seems to set out to prove it's own point by degrading our environment to a state where you might consider it to be true.

Of course the people, or rather entities involved in all this ignore the warnings from various (SF) writers at their leisure, and assume they are not henchmen in a greater scheme. For us the risks and for them's the rewards.

While all of this reeks of a Bene Gesserit style ploy sometimes, it has deeper layers illuminated by the true representations of God that we have experienced. They rose above the childish power struggles that this is ultimately all about, no scrap that. Childish as a diminishing word is exactly the kind of subtle inversion that got slowly baked into our language.. Pointless power struggles for material control might be more accurate..

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

If Even a Fraction of the What the Anti-Peck Blogs Are Reporting Is True . . .

Leave a Reply.

Archives