Francis Berger
  • Blog
  • My Work

It is Spiritually Impossible For a Christian to Be Altruistic

11/23/2022

7 Comments

 
In yesterday’s post I pointed out that altruism is not a Christian principle or virtue. I also had the audacity to declare that it was objectionable for Christians to pursue and engage in altruism. In this post I’m going to kick it up a notch and illustrate why aspiring to altruism is a spiritual impossibility for Christians.

Put another way, Christians who involve themselves with altruism are involved with a principle that is utterly incompatible with being a Christian. People can be an altruists, or they can be Christians, but they cannot be both. The very notion of an altruistic Christian is a self-contradiction – an oxymoron par excellence.

To begin with, altruism – in its purest definition – is an anti-Christian principle because it denies the reality of God. It thereby negates the first Christian commandment to love God. It also negates the second Christian commandment to love the neighbor because it rejects the spiritual reality of man.

Those who engage in altruism do not practice Christian love, which is an act directed at the concrete, real, spiritual person – at the innermost reality of what makes a person a person. Instead they practice what Auguste Comte defined as the moral obligation to renounce the self to live for the other. Comte believed this total submission of the self to others was vital to the benefit and progress of society, which in Comte’s positivism supplants the role of God.

In my post from yesterday, I included two of Dr.Charlton’s amplifications from Christopher Bamford’s distillation of Rudolf Steiner’s teaching concerning the purpose of mortal life on Earth. These were:

This is creation. Our life on Earth is spiritual; this spiritual life is about love; and this love is creation. Creation is made-of love; and the aim of evolution is to develop this love and consciousness of love.

Love among Men is not sufficient, but it is essential. The first commandment to love god, and the second commandment to love fellow Men are no longer, since Christ, possible to separate. Both are necessary for each other.

As Dr. Charlton notes, since Christ, it is insufficient to love God exclusively or to love one’s neighbors exclusively. To be a Christian, to truly practice and “create” Christian love, one must love God and love one’s neighbors inclusively. The two cannot be separated, which renders the altruistic moral obligation to renounce God for the sake the other nugatory.

Also, the second Christian commandment also calls on Christians to love their neighbors as they love themselves. Thus, self-love also becomes inseparable from love of the neighbor. A Christian who loves God and his neighbor must also love himself. Any Christian who does not love himself is incapable of truly loving God or the neighbor because he is denying the value and worth of his own spiritual essence.

Then there is also the question of ultimate purpose. In a comment from yesterday’s post, William Wildblood asks the following (bold added):

What is the purpose of altruistic action even assuming the altruism is genuine? To make the world a better place? To relieve suffering and spread happiness? That has nothing to do with Christian love which is directed solely to bringing a soul closer to God. In other words, Christian love is focused on spiritual ends. It is not well-meaning, it does not have good intentions and it is not benevolent. Christian love derives from God and seeks to bring everything back to God.

Dr. Charlton picked up on this point and added (bold added):

William W's question is worth bringing to mind in such discussions: "What is the purpose of altruistic action even assuming the altruism is genuine?"

The problem with the world is that it in fundamentally unsatisfactory, ultimately because everything in it decays and dies. We need to evaluate ethical claims in the light of spiritual purpose that addresses this fact.

To my mind, the desirability of any specific altruistic act should be evaluated in terms of being a means to some *positive* end - lacking which it is just 'moving deckchairs on the Titanic'.


Short answer – altruism offers no positive end for Christians – not even in cases when the altruistic action is genuine.

Though I have known this intuitively for quite some time, it was Max Scheler who brought the incompatibility of altruism and Christian love home for me via his short philosophical treatise, Ressentiment (bold added):

Finally, the ressentiment character of modern humanitarianism is also proved by the fact that its leading spokesmen (for example, Auguste Comte) describe it as “altruism.” For the Christian conception of love, devotion to one’s fellow man merely because he is the “other” is as false and misplaced as the liberal-individualistic idea that we best serve the whole and the community by perfecting ourselves—according to the saying: “When the rose adorns itself, it adorns the garden.”

In the Christian view, love is an act of a particular quality, directed at the ideal spiritual person as such, and it makes no difference whether it is the person of the lover or that of the “other.” That is why the Christian considers it sinful to renounce one’s “salvation” for somebody else’s sake! And therefore his own “salvation” is as important to him as love of his neighbor.

“Love God and thy neighbor as thyself,” is the Christian precept. It is characteristic that a leading spokesman of modern humanitarianism, Auguste Comte—the inventor of the term “altruism,” which is a barbarism—takes offense at this postulate. He accuses Christianity of aiding and abetting “egoistic impulses” because it commands us to care for our own salvation as well, and he wants to replace this precept by the new positivistic commandment: “Love thy neighbor more than thyself.”

He fails to see that Christian “love” is a particular kind of spiritual act, which is by its very essence primarily oriented toward the spiritual person (of God and men), and toward the body merely as its vessel and “temple.”

Thus the relation to the other is not an essential characteristic of Christian love, and Christianity necessarily knows a “self-love” which is basically different from all “egoism.” Comte fails to note that it is incomprehensible why our fellow man should have a right to benefaction - since love, for Comte, has value only as a “cause” for good deeds—for the silliest of reasons: simply because he is the “other.”

If I myself am not worthy of love, why should the “other” be? As if he were not also an “I”—for himself, and I “another”—for him! Comte ignores that his tenet is either a hyperbolical pathetic phrase or a nihilistic demand which destroys all vitality and indeed decomposes any structure of being!

But the real question is how such a demand is psychologically explicable. There is a delusion which consists in mistaking for love what is really a peculiar sham form of love, founded on self-hatred and self-flight.

In his Pensées, Blaise Pascal has drawn the classic picture of a type of man who is entangled in many worldly activities (games, sports, hunting, also “business” or unceasing work for the “community”), and all this merely because he cannot look at himself and continually tries to escape from the vacuum, from his feeling of nothingness.

In some psychoses, for example, in hysteria, we find a kind of “altruism‟ in which the patient has become incapable of feeling and experiencing anything “by himself.” All his experiences are sympathetic, built on those of another person and his possible attitude and expectation, his possible reaction to any event.

The patient’s own existence has lost its center and focus, he neglects all his affairs, is completely drawn into the “other’s” life—and suffers from it. He eats nothing or injures himself in order to vex the “other.”

In a milder form, the same phenomenon occurs in the movement of “universal humanitarian love.” This attitude sometimes takes the form of a collective delusion, as within the Russian intelligentsia, especially the academic youth of both sexes, which likes to inject its morbid urge for self-sacrifice and self-flight into social and socio-political “goals” and then interprets its morbidity as “moral heroism.”

The “social politician” who troubles his head about everything except himself and his own business (a type now increasingly frequent) is usually nothing but a poor and empty human being fleeing from himself.

Nietzsche is perfectly right in pointing out that this way of living and feeling is morbid, a sign of declining life and hidden nihilism, and that its “superior” morality is pretense. His criticism, however, does not touch the Christian love of one’s neighbor: it does touch an essential component of modern “love of mankind,” which is in effect fundamentally a socio-psychological phenomenon of degeneration.


In the Fourth Gospel, Christ instructs us to love one another, which points to the real purpose of the Earth and Men - what this world and our mortal lives are essentially for – the creation of relationships from which Beings can learn to love.  

Bearing this in mind, it becomes quite clear that altruism can teach Christians nothing about love.

Quite the contrary. The only thing altruism can teach Christians is how to abandon spirituality and submit to materialism, reductionism, positivism, and atheism.

Once a Christian willingly and actively submits to altruism, that Christian stops being a Christian because it is spiritually impossible for a Christian to embrace altruism and remain Christian.

​No wonder the System demands that Christians be altruistic!
7 Comments
Anti-Gnostic
11/23/2022 22:39:51

The older I get the more I sour on charitable giving. Socially, I bet we do more good being generous tippers than subsidizing poor lifestyle choices, which is all most charity does. Effective Altruism in particular seems to be a weird rationalization for funding political activism or gnostic causes rather than hiring a house cleaner for an elderly relative.

Charity seems to be just more of the extra burden of being religious that modern Christianity has on dismal offer for people.

Reply
Lady Mermaid
11/26/2022 02:31:28

From now on I'm limiting charitable giving to my local church and the specific missionaries it supports. Bruce Charlton is right that churches need to focus on evangelism in this day and age rather than charity programs that care only for the body. I like your point that generous tips are a better use of funds than charity programs.

Even in mission work, altruism has creeped in. I was guilty of participating in short term mission trips in which young people would focus on building projects, childcare, and other feel good activities. While these were enjoyable trips, I now realize that these were exercises in self indulgence. I was able to have a fun trip and feel good about "helping others". While mission work is critical for a church, it needs to focus on helping real long term missionaries and local churches in different communities; not simply serve as a vacation for young people to indulge their fancies of helping "the disadvantaged".

Reply
Francis Berger
11/27/2022 10:34:18

@ Lady Mermaid - Among many other things, altruism has supplanted traditional Christian caritas, which over time went from focusing on primarily on the spirit to focusing on the temporal to focusing on mostly secular/temporal.

Altruism confuses Christians. Didn't Jesus instruct us to help the poor, the sick, the weak? Didn't he tell the rich to give away their possessions? Didn't he work miracles that healed and cured?

Yes, but what was the real message behind those instructions and miracles?

It took me a long time to untangle altruism from Christian love. Unfortunately, most of what calls itself Christianity is feverishly working in the opposite direction, so it is hardly surprising that the subject confuses Christians so.

MVT
11/24/2022 02:46:45

These posts on love are fantastic! I've sensed there was something corrupt about altruism but I've never been able to explain why. I feel my discernment increases when I read posts like this that discuss foundational questions like What is love? And I've learned so much when you have all discussed What is evil?

Reply
Tupla-J link
11/24/2022 08:58:23

Excellent post and an important point. To be altruistic is to buy the feeling of helping others while not caring at all about what actually happens to them. It is entirely impersonal and thus inhuman.

Actually helping other people not only takes a lot of effort, but is often painful as well. Altruism is nothing but a feel good lie, as is the case concerning most of modern world.

Reply
Lady Mermaid link
11/26/2022 02:23:36

Your posts on altruism have helped me understand how much of modern leftism I have unintentionally absorbed. I previously considered altruism to be a corrupted aspect of Christianity. However, I now know that its origins have nothing to do w/ Christianity.

In a way, Ayn Rand was right. While she thought Christianity was for weaklings, I believe that she was really reacting the distorted versions of Christianity that focused more on a "social gospel" rather than genuine spiritual conversion. I pray that she accepted Christ when she saw the truth about Him rather than the fake gospel focused on welfare programs.

Reply
lea
11/27/2022 06:47:12

Who cares what Comte defines a certain word as? The part where you describe him expressing that 'love is a secondary function of other processes' should serve as instant disqualification of anything they had to say for several years at the very least, if not all of it.

Vote for creation and against destruction with every lever at your disposal.

Arguing semantics is fun until it gets boring, and then it does so quickly. I still waste time playing shitty games and watching pointless 'entertainment' - but whenever a central message like above crosses my path i just move along. It's a direct fit into the neuro/biological narrative of 'everything in a human being happens through receptors and chemicals'. Or in other words, ignore that nonsense completely.

We should not let people like that frame words for (our) general usage, even if altruism and by extent philantropy have largely turned into tainted tax haven disasters.

'Never let people steal words from you'; maybe Confucius, at some point.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Blog and Comments

    Blog posts tend to be spontaneous, unpolished, first draft entries ranging from the insightful and periodically profound to the poorly-argued and occasionally disparaging.
     

    Comments are moderated. Anonymous comments are never published (please use your name or a pseudonym). 

    Emails welcome:

    f er en c ber g er (at) h otm   ail (dot) co m
    Blogs/Sites I Read
    Bruce Charlton's Notions
    Meeting the Masters
    From The Narrow Desert
    Synlogos ✞ Aggregator
    New World Island  
    New World Island YouTube
    ​Steeple Tea
    Berdyaev.com
    Adam Piggott
    Fourth Gospel Blog
    The Orthosphere
    Junior Ganymede

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Picture
    A free PDF is also available in My Work. 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.