I don't usually comment on nor feature this sort of thing on the blog, but I thought the short video below presents a vivid example of a solid observation immediately followed by a . . . well . . . let's just call it an idiotic observation.
The professor of ancient history in the clip -- an ardent atheist who is most famous for his "edgy" rejection of the historicity of Jesus -- correctly identifies the beloved disciple in the Fourth Gospel as Lazarus.
And then goes on to make the claim that beloved disciple is actually code for boyfriend.
Yes. According to the esteemed professor, Jesus had a boyfriend, and that boyfriend was Lazarus.
I don't have much to add, other than . . . aw, forget it. Fools like these are not worth the effort.
The professor of ancient history in the clip -- an ardent atheist who is most famous for his "edgy" rejection of the historicity of Jesus -- correctly identifies the beloved disciple in the Fourth Gospel as Lazarus.
And then goes on to make the claim that beloved disciple is actually code for boyfriend.
Yes. According to the esteemed professor, Jesus had a boyfriend, and that boyfriend was Lazarus.
I don't have much to add, other than . . . aw, forget it. Fools like these are not worth the effort.
RSS Feed
