Francis Berger
  • Blog
  • My Work

Peterson Versus Zizek: Exactly the Kind of Debate Our Perishing Society Deserves

3/3/2019

2 Comments

 
Picture
Currently being billed as the most anticipated and significant philosophical event to occur this century, Jordan Peterson and Slavoj Zizek are scheduled to square off against each other in a debate promoted under the title Happiness: Capitalism versus Communism set to take place in Toronto in April.

I had three thoughts after I stumbled across this announcement. Firstly, I was struck by the oxymoronic and incongruous attempt to project the doctrines and beliefs of two opposing economic systems onto the nebulous screen of happiness. Secondly, the limited and tragic scope of what these two thinkers will determinedly discuss represents the core sickness of our contemporary malaise. Lastly, Peterson versus Zizek is exactly the kind of debate our spiritually depleted society deserves.

Although I am certain armchair philosophers and political aficionados relish the opportunity to watch and listen as these two "rock star" thinkers from opposite ends of the ideological spectrum go head-to-head, I view the upcoming debate as nothing more than an opportunistic moneymaking venture for those involved. In addition, I believe the debate will amount to nothing more than a mundane and infuriating waste of time.

Here’s why. Peterson and Zizek are both materialists who believe human happiness resides purely in the physical realm. Of the two thinkers, Zizek is the more sincere. An avowed atheist who sees humanity’s suffering and salvation solely within the framework of Marxism and Lacanian psychology, Zizek is both upfront and straightforward concerning his denial of the transcendent and the metaphysical. Peterson, on the other hand, presents a far more slippery position. Lauding the current ruling form of global corporate capitalism as a force for good, Peterson makes occasional forays into the realm of the metaphysical by citing Bible verses and ancient myths, but he presents his erratic interpretations firmly within the framework of materialism. Thus, happiness resides purely in the material world for both Peterson and Zizek; the only bone of contention between them is which system is superior in terms of providing for humanity’s material needs and wants, which for both Peterson and Zizek remains the only possible realm within which human happiness can be discussed or realized.

The debate will be blandly predictable, in my humble opinion. Peterson will undoubtedly cite the great progress and improved standards of living the past and current forms of capitalism have ushered into existence. He will reference UN reports and research papers from organizations such as Human Progress to emphasize the tremendous rise in quality of life around the world, particularly in underdeveloped regions. He will speak of personal freedoms and material improvements and hold recent generations up as the most fortunate yet least grateful ones to ever have existed in history. He will attack Zizek by launching into tirades denouncing the horrors of communism and cite Dostoevsky and Solzhenitsyn ad nauseum to back Zizek into a corner. He will then hotly inform Zizek that all the myths and religions of human history support the superiority of capitalism and the divine individual, roughly speaking, of course.

Zizek in turn will sputter and spray on about mishandled and misinterpreted communism, the hypocrisy of liberalism, and the increasing disparities global corporate capitalism has created around the world. He will attack capitalism as fascism, censure creeping totalitarianism, and praise future collectivism as humanity’s only hope. Many arrows will be released into the sky, and I am certain some interesting points may be made by both parties, but in the end, none of the arrows will find their mark because the debaters will speak past each other. In the end, the entire foundation of the debate will be pointless because it will purposefully neglect the real causes of human happiness and unhappiness.

In fact, if I had been the debate organizer, I would have called the event Blind Spot: How Both Capitalism and Communism Fail to Create Human Happiness. Peterson and Zizek both deny the significance of the metaphysical – the former, elusively; the latter, directly. Regardless, both men are acutely aware of the iceberg the West struck long ago; both know the ship is sinking, but neither is willing to accept the one thing that could save everyone on board.

Rather than recognize the metaphysical solution to the sinking ship problem, Peterson and Zizek will both stand near the bow rearranging the deck chairs. As they do so, they will be perfectly content to quibble over that evening’s dinner menu in the ship’s opulent restaurant. Peterson will offer a pseudo-mystical Jungian filet covered in capitalism and responsibility sauce with a side of archetype word salad while Zizek will insist upon a sticky Lacanian stew topped with crispy Hegel bits and a stale piece of Marxist bread.

Neither menu offering will prove to be particularly appetizing. Both offerings are destined to leave the ship’s passengers unsatisfied, yet the diners will flock to the restaurant all the same. Afterward, the diners will suffer from indigestion as they trudge back to their cabins. Once in their own rooms, they willful ignore the icy water sloshing around their ankles as they argue over which menu selection was superior. In the morning, the passengers will awaken to water levels above their knees, but even then, very few will consider manning the lifeboats.

Simply put, arguing over material concerns and material distribution of wealth will not stop the ship from sinking. The only thing that can save us is acknowledgment and acceptance of Reality – the only solution to our dilemma rests in the development of our consciousness toward this metaphysical Reality.

Until we awaken from our slumber and its resultant alienation and realign our consciousness with Reality, debates featuring the likes of Peterson and Zizek will be deemed the only ones worthy of being held. They will also remain the only kinds of debate we deserve. 
2 Comments
palintropos
3/5/2019 15:59:30

I guess my question is: In a situation where black museum guards complain about discrimination against them by museum officials what would Peterson or Zizek do if they were the sole Trustee?

Which one would hire a feminist director? (I can't believe Peterson would do this.) Which one would tell the black guards to quit and go work at the African-American Museum of History and Culture down the block; and let the European-Americans worship at their own temple? What would they do?

Reply
Francis Berger
3/5/2019 17:32:18

What an amusing hypothetical superimposition of Peterson and Zizek on a real-life case of political correctness run amok.

To answer your question - I do not know what Peterson or Zizek would do if either was the Trustee, but I imagine both would be quick to organize a money-making debate around the issue first.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Blog and Comments

    Blog posts tend to be spontaneous, unpolished, first draft entries ranging from the insightful and periodically profound to the poorly-argued and occasionally disparaging.
     

    Comments are moderated. Anonymous comments are never published (please use your name or a pseudonym). 

    Emails welcome:

    f er en c ber g er (at) h otm   ail (dot) co m
    Blogs/Sites I Read
    Bruce Charlton's Notions
    Meeting the Masters
    From The Narrow Desert
    Synlogos ✞ Aggregator
    New World Island  
    New World Island YouTube
    ​Steeple Tea
    Berdyaev.com
    Adam Piggott
    Fourth Gospel Blog
    The Orthosphere
    Junior Ganymede

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Picture
    A free PDF is also available in My Work. 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.