Francis Berger
  • Blog
  • My Work

There is No Higher Reality; Only Reality, And Only Religious Consciousness is Capable of Perceiving It

2/6/2020

5 Comments

 
This is one of those exploratory blog posts that might not make sense in the end, but here goes.

I spent some time thinking about Reality today, and I toyed with the conclusion that I have probably - for most of my life - nurtured flawed notions about what the perception of Reality entails.

For most of my adult life, I have tended to view Reality as something like a vertical scale spanning the lower to the higher, with everyday, common, material reality occupying the lower levels of perception, and transcendent, metaphysical reality occupying the higher levels.

Within this framework, one's quality of perception/thinking determined what level of reality one was capable of perceiving. Consciousnesses rooted primarily in the vulgar and the material tended only to perceive or find meaning in the lower levels, while those with more refined or spiritual consciousnesses were able to glimpse or recognize higher levels of reality.

However, as I thought about this today, I began to suspect this might be a flawed and incorrect way of conceptualizing consciousness and its relation to and perception of Reality because it implies that those who perceive Reality at the purely material level still perceive some sense of Reality, but lack the "muscle" to perceive the higher levels.

Perhaps they do, but what if these perceptions are willfully ignored, unacknowledged, neglected, ignored, or misunderstood? The perception might still exist, but lacking a foundation of intuitive understanding, this perception essentially becomes meaningless, akin to hearing a language one does not speak or understand. The sound is there, but the words make no sense. After a while, a person in this position is faced with two choices: learn the foreign language, or block it out completely. This, however, presupposes that the preceptor even recognizes the heard language as language and not just noise.   

Seen this way, perception takes a back seat to acknowledging, accepting, and understanding. Being aware that the noise is language is the first step, but awareness of the language does one no good if one is unwilling to comprehend it. Put another way, the 'reality' of the perceived language remains inaccessible and meaningless if the effort to understand it is not made.  

My problem with this idea is the notion of effort. This directly implies consciousness must be developed and trained like a muscle for it to understand or perceive higher levels of reality, the same way the brain and the organs of speech must be trained to master a language. The implication is that without this sort of development, consciousness is incapable of tackling higher levels of reality in the same way untrained muscles are incapable of tackling certain arduous physical tasks. 

But what if consciousness/reality perception was not really about the training of the consciousness in order to perceive higher levels of reality, but rather about aligning consciousness in such a way that it can perceive Reality in its totality? This perception of Reality in its totality - that the lower and higher are actually all connected and interacting - would then lead one to understanding, an understanding that would actually require very little in the way of effort.

In other words, perceiving Reality might not be so much about effort, but more about openness and acceptance.  

Reality is there for all to sense and understand, all the time, but most do not accept this Reality as real. The inability to perceive Reality in its totality does not come down to not having developed the proper "consciousness muscles" or "communication skills" due to some apparent weakness in consciousness, but more of a matter of being closed to what the true nature of Reality is. Put another way, Reality exists before all consciousness, and all consciousnesses exist in Reality, but most consciousnesses do not accept Reality as Reality because they do not accept the axioms supporting Reality. 

Yes, this is akin to the idea of lower/higher and the division of Reality into rising and descending levels, but the notable difference is this - the process of training consciousness to ascend to higher levels of understanding and perception is eliminated and replaced with a process closer to simply aligning the consciousness with Reality in order to not only perceive it, but intuitively understand it. In other words, it comes down to the basic matter of core assumptions. Aligning consciousness with Reality is the foundation of religious thinking, which is the only mode of thinking capable of perceiving Reality as a whole.

Approached from this angle, mystics and spiritual thinkers are not individuals with elevated levels of consciousness capable of perceiving higher levels of reality, but rather individuals with properly-aligned consciousnesses capable of identifying and perceiving Reality in its totality. Seen this way, any failure to recognize and comprehend Reality does not indicate a lack of "muscle", but a lack of imagination, intuition, and faith. 
5 Comments
bruce charlton
2/6/2020 16:48:57

I get it!

I think I know exactly what you mean, because I share this suspicion about methods, training, effort etc - like Zen training or Steiners Anthroposophical exercises - and I don't see evidence that it actually achieves the desired goal (it achieves something else, and often something more dubious - like focused willpower).

Of course, when one rejects standard methods and training programs, then it is difficult to suggest anything constructive without falling into exactly the same trap. As you say, we know where we want to be (in alignment) but how to get there seems to be different for different people, and to change for each person as the journey proceeds.

But a few weeks ago I had what felt like an insight that we are not really supposed to make incremental progress through our mortal lives (everything works against it, both externally and internally - so it doesn't look like the world has been designed for that to happen). That was that we are meant to have experiences and learn from them - rather than to become transformed towards an ideal.

So we may make zero 'progress' - we may fail to gain spiritual 'height' or 'strength' - and yet we may have sometimes achieve the alignment we hope for; and when we do at some level we learn from this - the 'pay off' coming in resurrected life, rather than during this life.

Such a view, makes sense to me because it helps orientate my efforts towards Heaven, rather than on worldly success.

A disadvantage is that worldly people (which is most of us, most of the time) can point to lack of lasting spiritual transformation as evidence that the whole thing is ineffective and a waste of time.

It can indeed be depressing that there seem to be no saints in one's personal environment nor even men or women 'qualitatively' more-holy than me, and becoming progressively more holy...

But that may be one of the phenomena that belong to an earlier phase of human consciousness, one of many things that are no longer possible - and other different things are, perhaps, becoming possible, and probably ought to be our focus here and now.

Reply
Francis Berger
2/6/2020 21:57:58

@ Bruce - "we are meant to have experiences and learn from them - rather than to become transformed towards an ideal." Yes, I get that sense, too. I also get the sense the learning - true learning - can only when we accept the totality of Reality as Reality. If we manage to do that, we align ourselves with Reality. That alignment is not a constant, or an ideal, or a permanent state, but rather a receptiveness that moves with the rhythm of our lives and our experiences in this world.

I don't know how else to articulate it for the time being, but this makes more sense to me than the path of never-ending spiritual exertion for the sake of some pay-off or breakthrough in this world.

Reply
Bookslinger
2/8/2020 20:32:19

i'm no scientist, but the more I read of higher spatial dimensions, quantum theory, and string theory, the more possibilities I see that "spiritual" is just as real as our three-dimensional world.

I imagine the Godhead (Trinity) to be beings of 4 or more dimensions who interact with our 3D world as a sub-set of their higher-dimensions.

The infinitely multi-tasking nature of God also strongly, almost to the point of "proof", implies the multi-dimensional nature of time.

The Bible says that we are an "image" of God. I wonder if that is in the sense that a 2D picture is an "image" of a 3D object. So, if we are a 3D image, does that imply God is a 4D being?

Higher physical dimensions are an explanatory tool that makes sense of the visions of Ezekiel and John the Revelator.

Quantum physicists say that 10 spatial dimensions are needed to make their equations work, (Michio Kaku in his book "Hyperspace.")

Reply
Mark Millward
2/12/2020 20:41:10

Bravo Francis! For a moment there I thought you might be seduced by the Gnostic rabbit hole. In the end you pulled back to a very worthwhile article & true conclusion (in my humble opinion!).

Reply
Francis Berger
2/14/2020 08:23:08

Sorry Mark. Your comment ended up in the spam folder, and I just noticed it today.

Thanks. Yes, I try my best to avoid the Gnostic rabbithole whenever possible.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Blog and Comments

    Blog posts tend to be spontaneous, unpolished, first draft entries ranging from the insightful and periodically profound to the poorly-argued and occasionally disparaging.
     

    Comments are moderated. Anonymous comments are never published (please use your name or a pseudonym). 

    Emails welcome:

    f er en c ber g er (at) h otm   ail (dot) co m
    Blogs/Sites I Read
    Bruce Charlton's Notions
    Meeting the Masters
    From The Narrow Desert
    Synlogos ✞ Aggregator
    New World Island  
    New World Island YouTube
    ​Steeple Tea
    Berdyaev.com
    Adam Piggott
    Fourth Gospel Blog
    The Orthosphere
    Junior Ganymede

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Picture
    A free PDF is also available in My Work. 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.