Francis Berger
  • Blog
  • My Work

Using Hanlon's Razor To Slit Our Own Throats

5/19/2020

10 Comments

 
As a greater portion of the West slowly emerges from stringent lockdown measures and staggers into a world of confusing and seemingly pointless social restrictions, I find I am still pondering the very same question I began to ponder just days before the lockdown went into effect:

Why do most people fail to recognize the underlying evil motivations fueling the draconian measures that have been imposed upon them during the birdemic? 

Many possible explanations exist, but in my mind they all find root in the metaphysical. That is, modern man is largely incapable of recognizing true evil because he has acquired an extremely flawed and limited conception of the fundamental nature of reality. His conception of the relationships between mind and matter, between substance and attribute, and between potentiality and actuality have become blurred and confused. Through the conscious and willing rejection of God and Divine Creation, modern people have essentially lost the plot of reality and have become very much like the captives in Plato's cave allegory - mesmerized into believing the outlines of projected shadows mark the limits of all known reality.

By rejecting God, modern people have also rejected belief in supernatural evil, which is entirely understandable - for it makes no sense to believe in the existence of the devil if belief in God is refuted. Thus, for modern people evil becomes a purely material phenomenon that can only be explained by material factors such as nature, chemistry, psychology, sociology and the like.

At first glance, this range of criteria appears fairly wide-ranging, but it is actually quite restrictive, which might help explain why modern people harbor such narrow and incomplete definitions of evil. Dr. Bruce Charlton has written much about these narrow definitions of evil and argues that moderns ironically appear to recognize Luciferic evil (driven by lower emotions like rage, lust, envy, greed and characterized by murder and violence), but are utterly blind to Ahrimanic evil (cold, calculating, faceless, bureaucratic malevolence characterized by committees, management structures, micro-managing and micro-surveillance).  

I fully agree with Dr. Charlton's assessment. If the lockdown has proven anything, it has proven this - most contemporary people truly are blind to cold machinations of bureaucratic evil.

But how did this come to be?

Perhaps a partial explanation can be found in Hanlon's Razor - a philosophical aphorism that posits the following: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." In other words, any interpretation of malevolence might actually be nothing more than a misinterpretation of stupidity and incompetence.

Applying Hanlon's Razor to the unprecedented measures authorities around the world imposed upon their respective populations in response to the birdemic results in the following line of thinking: "Sure, it looks like it might have been done with malevolent intentions, but it is more likely just a case of ignorant and misguided politicians, experts, and policymakers scrambling to make hard decisions based on incomplete and inaccurate data and projection models."

Now, Hanlon's Razor can be a useful tool in discerning mere incompetence - to do the opposite, to assume malice to be the root of all actions and decisions is to veer into the dark realm of paranoia - but the swiftness with which modern people embrace Hanlon's Razor to explain away obvious cases of malicious intent and action leads back to the limited comprehension modern people have of the fundamental nature of reality. 

That the line separating good from evil runs through the heart of every man was one of Alexander Solzhenitsyn's most famous observations. Modern people appear enamored by this idea, but for all the wrong reasons. Misinterpreting the wisdom inherent in Solzhenitsyn's insight, contemporary people simply accept the impossibility of pure good and evil. Yes, some people are more good than others; and others are more 'evil'; but no individual person is truly good or evil. Basically, humans are nothing more than fleshy, animated yin-yang symbols; and even the most 'evil' human possesses some attributes of good (racists, bigots, phobes, and the like excepted). 

No person is wholly good or evil. That's a fact. A truth. But if it's not anchored in the proper context, this truth can easily be misapplied. Put another way, modern people view Solzhenitsyn's observation as a 'get out of jail free card' - as a means through which to explain away the presence of human evil. Lacking all religious tools to judge, weigh, and assess the presence of human evil, modern people merely shrug and say "I have it in me to do it, too."

Yet once again, the actual definitions of evil here are likely extremely narrow and limited to the Luciferic conceptions of evil mentioned above. Moderns basically equate Luciferic evil in humanity with stupidity and incompetence, where the greatest blunder is not the actual committal of immorality or crime, but the stupidity and incompetence that allowed one to be caught in the act.

But what about Ahrimanic evil?

Modern people often employ Hanlon's Razor when criticizing or lambasting their elected political officials. Malice is rarely addressed, at least through officially-sanctioned channels, and nearly all seemingly malevolent actions and decisions are peremptorily written off as stupidity or incompetence. 

But there is more to it than that. Much more. Meandering speculations about Hanlon's Razor aside, I sense modern people do not recognize Ahrimanic evil as evil for the simple reason that most sincerely view bureaucracy as a force for good. Modern people know bureaucracies - organizations, committees, political bodies, corporate boards, etc. - are crammed with flawed, fleshy yin yangs who are often tempted to commit 'bad deeds', but they do not believe that this makes the forms of bureaucracy evil in of themselves (for example, think of those who steadfastly defend abstractions like democracy).

The only notion of heaven most modern Westerners are willing to consider is a temporal one. Contemporary bureaucratic structures, policies, and frameworks are the only means through which this temporal heaven can be established. What does this temporal heaven, this worldly utopia comprise? A greener planet. Universal basic income. Increased international cooperation leading to eventual one-world governance. And so forth. Any threat to this vision of material heaven must be dealt with swiftly and severely, and it must be dealt with swiftly and severely exclusively through bureaucratic means. 

Modern people do not recognize Ahrimanic evil as evil because they wholeheartedly believe that Ahriman is a force for good. The rejection of God and Divine Creation leaves no other option. Heaven on earth will not build itself. Such a goal requires an intricate network of plans, committees, management, data, laws, rules, regulations and everything else Ahriman comprises. And any perception of malice in this great project will be attributed to stupidity and incompetence. After all, how could those who strive to build heaven on earth possibly possess 'real' malice or be 'really' evil? 

Well, if one rejects all belief in supernatural evil, then those who strive to help build heaven on earth can't really be malicious at all. At worst, they are stupid. Or incompetent. Or both.

​But evil? To most modern people, the very notion is incomprehensible. 

Note added: Creating heaven on earth also entails guaranteeing certain 'inalienable' human rights, most of which are blatant moral inversions that are in direct opposition to the Divine. Ahriman serves to endorse, legislate, and enforce these inversions, the bulk of which modern people no longer even recognize as such. Modern people also genuinely believe bureaucratic structures sincerely care about the well-being of all individual people. Merely mentioning that this is not the case strikes most modern people as anathema. 
10 Comments
Epimethean
5/20/2020 01:32:16

That's interesting, that the universal capacity for evil just makes secular people morally complacent - evil just becomes everyday, ho-hum.

I've been wondering if the demonic purpose of bureaucracy is to eliminate all human participation in life - by eliminating all human decision-making - thus eliminating the whole point of human existence. Once all possibility of choice, judgement, and action has been removed, the completely passive human being has no further reason to exist.

Does suicidal despair follows as a logical and emotional consequence? Have Western Men been emasculated by the simple process of removing more and more personal decision-making from their hands? The powers and principalities have done this so slowly as to be imperceptible, but the result appears to be nigh-on total and complete.

It is interesting to contemplate the concepts of God's omnipotence, the potency of men, and the potential of the future - and to connect them all. A man's potency has something to do with his ability to participate in life - to participate where the future flows into the present. A capable man can participate in many different possible situations, who can improvise when surprised, who can contemplate many possible courses of action. And, of course, a potent man can generate many possible children.

Reply
Francis Berger
5/20/2020 10:16:26

@ Epi - Thanks for the comment. You covered a lot of ground in it. To address a few points you've raised:

1. Yes, I believe part of the demonic plan involves rendering humanity more passive and docile. The ultimate goal of DM is soul damnation - apathy and passivity is an effective way to reach said goal.

2. Despair inducement leading to suicide does appear to be a part of the current agenda (once again, for the purpose of damnation).

3. I don't believe God is omnipotent, and I do believe we possess far more potency than we tend to believe. The ideal situation involves the meeting of God's strong (but not omnipotent) potency and man's weaker (but crucial and necessary) potency. The combination of these two 'potentials' is what leads to creation - and this is exactly what the powers in this world strive to prevent.

Reply
bruce charlton
5/20/2020 09:25:03

I haven't heard the name of Hanlon's razer before, but like Occam's it is an anti-scientific excuse for not-thinking. There is no good reason for assuming one kind of explanation is true. A real scientist, a real Person, wants to know what is the cause in this specific situation. If you really want to know the reality of a situation, then why would you start your investigation by assuming that you already know it?

What people fail to realise is that this kind of prejudice sets up an investigation where the outcome is predetermined; because such an assumption can never be overturned by evidence.

We see this all the time nowadays, when there is an official hypothesis - and it does not matter what evidence accumulates, that hypothesis is always maintained. Because any specific piece of evidence can always be interpreted in many ways, or it may be regarded as itself an error, or the product of lying.

An example from my experience is the differences in average intelligence between social classes. In the mid 1960s it was decided (socio-politically) that these did not exist - and that all social classes were of equal intelligence - it is asserted i.e the children of brain surgeons and astrophysicists are on average of exactly equal intelligence to the children of farm labourers and chronically unemployed folk.

There are thousands of pieces of published evidence going back a century that this assertion is false, and no evidence that it is true; yet it remains officially true and enforced and the basis of public policy and all mainstream political parties.

Each piece of evidence is examined separately, and regarded as ambiguous and/or the product of snobbery or fascist fake-researchers - so evidence makes zero difference.

Likewise with Hanlon - anything that ever happens can be explained by incompetence, error, unpredictability of what are assumed to be well-meaning people.

Reply
Francis Berger
5/20/2020 10:25:58

Your comment nails it down well, Bruce.

"Likewise with Hanlon - anything that ever happens can be explained by incompetence, error, unpredictability of what are assumed to be well-meaning people."

And that is the general attitude of people today. This immediately raises the question of why modern people are so willing to tolerate incompetence, error, and stupidity - especially from those in positions of power. The erroneously-assumed benevolence of our ruling elites should not provide the basis for the tolerance of such a high level of stupidity and error - yet it somehow does.

In this sense, Hanlon's razor is like a real razor - it cut on both edges. On the one hand, it callously dismisses the often very real existence of malice. On the other hand, it creates conditions for the general acceptance of incompetence, stupidity, and error as standard practice.

Either way, the adoption of Hanlon's Razor as a mode of non-thinking reveals a great deal about the current state of modern people.

Reply
Craig Davis
5/20/2020 13:25:36

Of course,Hanlon's Razor is so easy to believe because the bureaucracy is so often incompetent, conveniently helping to mask the evil.

Reply
Francis Berger
5/20/2020 13:52:42

That's a good point, Craig, but I don't get why incompetence somehow rules out malice for most people. Can't something/someone be malicious and incompetent/stupid? Does no one remember Dr. Evil from the Austin Powers movies?

Reply
Craig Davis
5/20/2020 20:09:42

Never underestimate the power of denial.

Ingemar
5/20/2020 16:31:33

I rejected Hanlon's Razor because it forces me to accept the notion that our leaders--who pushed fraud-based economics, in utero genocide, racial hatred, legal opacity and violations of national sovereignty--are all stupid.

Reply
Francis Berger
5/20/2020 20:45:19

I agree, Ingemar.

Reply
Sean Fowler link
5/22/2020 11:03:51

Its a tricky one this. Always extremely difficult to differentiate between planned events and organic events. Or let’s say events that occurred as a result of strategic evil and those that occurred naturally,perhaps inevitably, as a consequence of previous events, time,place and context.
Equally so with stupidity and evil.
I think it’s rare to see intelligent, controlled, conscious acts of destructive evil among humans. There is nearly always an element of stupidity involved in such acts. Or at least a severe lack of wisdom and sound judgement. Committing acts of evil is never a good idea.
Hanlons razor is probably correct in that, an act of evil, is impossible to execute without a large degree of stupidity. And by stupidity I don’t mean a lack of intelligence, rather a lack of wisdom, sound judgement and self control.
Evil thrives upon stupidity. Perhaps it even owes its existence to it.
Satan must be a complete idiot.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Blog and Comments

    Blog posts tend to be spontaneous, unpolished, first draft entries ranging from the insightful and periodically profound to the poorly-argued and occasionally disparaging.
     

    Comments are moderated. Anonymous comments are never published (please use your name or a pseudonym). 

    Emails welcome:

    f er en c ber g er (at) h otm   ail (dot) co m
    Blogs/Sites I Read
    Bruce Charlton's Notions
    Meeting the Masters
    From The Narrow Desert
    Synlogos ✞ Aggregator
    New World Island  
    New World Island YouTube
    ​Steeple Tea
    Berdyaev.com
    Adam Piggott
    Fourth Gospel Blog
    The Orthosphere
    Junior Ganymede

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Picture
    A free PDF is also available in My Work. 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.