The post ended with the words, “Do not comply!” Interestingly enough, the first brief comment immediately following the post offered an exasperated challenge to the noble, defiant command. “Do not comply? How in the hell am I supposed to not comply with that?”
It’s a pertinent question. We saw how quickly people complied with the peck when threatened with job loss. Most never even made it that far and gave in the second they faced ultimatums concerning school attendance, travel restrictions, going to nightclubs, eating in restaurants, playing sports, and so on.
Of course, people who complied with the peck for any of the reasons above will undoubtedly have little or no reservations about falling in line with a central bank digital currency, especially if the Establishment introduces the CBDC as a “solution” to a pressing, overriding “problem” that requires an immediate solution. But what about the people that are serious about not complying with a CBDC? What choice(s) will they ultimately have?
The ominous threat of a cashless society has loomed on the horizon for decades, so despite the ever-increasing headlines on the subject in the media, I think it is unwise to obsess over things like CDBCs. There’s no guarantee that the Establishment will ever implement such a system (they may just be issuing threats). If it does, there’s every possibility that the system will not work (the technology may be flawed; they may lack qualified people to oversee such a system; the public may resist, etc.) That doesn’t mean we should be complacent about the Establishment’s agenda; it just means that we shouldn’t assume that everything the Establishment promulgates via the media will come to fruition or work in the way the Establishment envisions it.
Returning to the exasperated comment about non-compliance, let’s assume the Establishment successfully implements a “Mark of the Beast” financial system in the West. Let's also assume it is a system from which no one -- not even the most gun-happy, bunker-stocked, bomb-sheltered, gold and silver-laden prepper/survivalist -- is immune. How can we / do we not comply?
We do not comply when we actively choose to see/understand the thing for what it is and remain firmly aligned with God and Creation despite everything.
Seeing/understanding the thing for what it is means seeing/understanding that a CBDC, like the birdemic and its peck, is a product of pure demonic evil with no redeeming, God-aligned qualities whatsoever. That means no personal rationalizations, justifications, or excuses like the ones we witnessed and experienced during the birdemic and its subsequent peck agenda.
Remaining aligned with God and Creation is the active choice to adhere to the created world while the given world appears to overwhelm it. This choice is eternal.
I’ll refer to everyone’s favorite “anti-Christ” philosopher whose most famous aphorism “Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you” is known even to those who have never read Nietzsche and would struggle to spell his name.
A CBDC system would be the totalitarian capstone of the Establishment’s highest Ahrimanic ambitions. Everyone will be gazing into the abyss if such a system comes to be; however, how we gaze into the abyss matters.
Will our gaze welcome and embrace the abyss? Will we gaze into it with fear and terror? How about resentment? Despair? Or will we choose to gaze into the abyss differently?
Moreover, while we are gazing into the abyss, the abyss will also be gazing into us. What will it see when it does? Will it see an inglorious reflection of itself and its demonic motivations, or will it see something else entirely?
What the abyss sees is entirely up to us. That is where "do not comply" matters because it is there that our choice for God and Creation will sear into the abyss for all eternity.
Oh, and by the way, the abyss is always gazing into you in this world . . . or at least trying to.