Francis Berger
  • Blog
  • My Work

Yearning for a Given Christian World Instead of Living in Creation

12/15/2022

6 Comments

 
I get the sense that the romantic aspect of Romantic Christianity causes much confusion and consternation among co-religionists. For most, the adjective cancels out the noun it modifies.

Other modifiers – Catholic, Protestant, Evangelical, Orthodox, Traditional, Liberal – are broadly accepted and comprehended as describing words meant to provide further details about Christianity, but the addition of Romantic before Christianity strikes most Christians as incongruous and inconsistent. 

Mention romanticism and most people envision something fanciful and unreal, an approach and attitude prone to fantasizing or idealizing. This applies to the romantic approach to Christianity, which involves the active choice to develop consciousness, creatively participate in Creation, and fulfill God’s divine plan. It's enough to make most Christians cry heresy or run for the exits.

The reaction is somewhat understandable considering Romanticism's failure to overcome alienation by vivifying Christianity in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. The Romantic impulse attempted but ultimately fell short and succumbed to materialism. Romanticism has never entirely disappeared, but its faint residue has often been misinterpreted or misapplied. 

For conventional Christians, fusing Romanticism with Christianity is the epitome of misinterpretation and misapplication. They insist that the last thing Christianity need is romanticism. After all, it already has its 2000-year tradition, its authority, its scripture, its doctrines, its dogmata, and its churches.

If Christianity needs anything at all, it is faithful and obedient followers of the 2000-year tradition and everything contained within it. 

The 2000-year tradition and all it encompasses is undeniably real and true, but are contemporary Christians true to the 2000-year tradition, or are they estranged and alienated from it?

Does their participation in the 2000-year tradition emanate robustly and meaningfully from the internal, or is it mostly a matter of conforming passively to the external?
 
Put another way, do Christians participate in a Christianity of givenness or a Christianity of creativity?
 
If Christianity is to have any future, it must become creative once again. If it remains in its current state of givenness, the larger given world will eclipse it.

The only way Christianity can become creative again is to romanticize itself and the world. 

Ask Christians what they dream of and most will tell you that they dream of living in a given Christian world. Most are blind to the created world they live in; even blinder to the created world that lives in them.

The first step in this time and place is to look within. The divine calling to overcome the given world and continue God’s Creation is there, waiting to be discovered. 
6 Comments
bruce g charlton
12/16/2022 08:04:52

A good 'defense' of the 'romantic' term.

I personally got it (proximately) from the book Romantic Religion by RJ Reilly, which is about the Inklings Tolkien, Lewis, Williams and Barfield - and represented what I most wanted from Christianity, and what I think Christianity most needed.

Because, if we take a step back and acknowledge that - for use here-and-now - the term Romantic 'has problems' - then so also does the term 'Christianity'. Either alone is inadequate for our needs, and will be a distorting and potentially malign influence

(Yes! Christianity too - as we see from the state of the mainstream Churches. Christianity without Romanticism has failed.)

It is only when Romanticism and Christianity are put together that we get what we need.

Reply
Francis Berger
12/16/2022 08:58:24

@ Bruce - "It is only when Romanticism and Christianity are put together that we get what we need."

Yes, I share that conviction. Romanticism on its own is a non-starter in today's world; Christianity on its own has been faltering for at least two centuries.

Reply
Rui Artur
12/16/2022 13:22:38


There are interesting etymological and cultural dimensions to this term, which make it paradoxical. It seems to me that the Romanticism you and Bruce speak of, and which I largely agree with, is more Celtic than Roman. And yet 'Romantic' comes from Romance, which comes from Roman. It seems Celtic not only in its modern manifestation (the Inklings, etc), but also in its spirit and in its history - what we know of Celtic Christianity was much more 'creation-centered', freer... one would say 'Romantic' in the modern sense.

Reply
Francis Berger
12/16/2022 19:28:03

@ Rui Artur - When I speak of Romanticism, I am primarily focusing on a movement in consciousness that occurred toward the end of the eighteenth-century. This movement in consciousness had many of the "ingredients" needed to overcome the alienation and gradual weakening of faith that had been building through the centuries. As you no doubt know, Romanticism quickly veered off into materialism and hedonism.

Romanticizing Christianity involves internalizing it to the point that one knows Christianity to be true and takes personal responsibility for it, regardless of external factors.This is what makes it "creation-centered and freer". It provides a living, striving motivation that energizes and encourages a direction away from alienation and despair. If that fits your interpretation of Celtic Christianity, then fine; as long we understand that we are not speaking about another form of "organized, external" Christianity, historical or otherwise.

Reply
JMSmith
12/16/2022 14:04:36

In addition to creativity we could use some help from the Holy Spirit. Romanticism advocated opening the soul to non-rational influences, but as time advanced, more and more of what came through that opening was demonic and perverse. In the case of "creative" Christianity, a great deal of what it "creates" is childish kitsch. I agree that we cannot simply hunker down and fondle old wineskins, but creativity that is not aided by the Holy Spirit will end up expressing the Id, or worse.

Reply
Francis Berger
12/16/2022 19:46:32

@ JM - I agree. Romanticism on its own is likely to cause more harm than good. However, the same could be said for many contemporary forms of Christianity. As Bruce notes above, both are required, with the right motivations, of course.

As I see it, the Holy Spirit plays a necessary and, I believe, manifest role in the Romantic Christian approach, which advocates opening the soul to the Holy Spirit. Berdyaev went as far as to refer to his final epoch of Christian consciousness as the Religion of the Holy Spirit. He even claimed the Religion of the Spirit would be quite different from the Christianity we know, but saw this as fulfillment rather than replacement.

The creativity I'm getting at involves art but is not limited to it. Creativity is an internal process at first - the active choice to meet the Holy Spirit within; a choice that leads to an inner transformation. External creativity, comes later, when the Holy Spirit agrees to co-operate and co-create with the individual; when the Holy Spirit within the individual enlivens the heart, and the heart in turn enlivens the world. And if the creativity fails to manifest expressly in mortal life, it will certainly be accessible in life everlasting.

There is great danger in freedom and creativity, no doubt about it,. Both require courage and daring. They also require the right motivation, honesty, and repentance. But there is no "safe" path in Christianity anymore. In this sense, I believe RC to be a risk well-worth taking.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Blog and Comments

    Blog posts tend to be spontaneous, unpolished, first draft entries ranging from the insightful and periodically profound to the poorly-argued and occasionally disparaging.
     

    Comments are moderated. Anonymous comments are never published (please use your name or a pseudonym). 

    Emails welcome:

    f er en c ber g er (at) h otm   ail (dot) co m
    Blogs/Sites I Read
    Bruce Charlton's Notions
    Meeting the Masters
    From The Narrow Desert
    Synlogos ✞ Aggregator
    New World Island  
    New World Island YouTube
    ​Steeple Tea
    Berdyaev.com
    Adam Piggott
    Fourth Gospel Blog
    The Orthosphere
    Junior Ganymede

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    June 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    April 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    October 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012

    Picture
    A free PDF is also available in My Work. 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.